References

Ard JL, Tobin K, Huncke T, Kline R, Ryan SM, Bell C A survey of the American Society of Anesthesiologists regarding environmental attitudes, knowledge, and organization. A A Case Rep.. 2016; 6:(7) https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000000184

Bullock JM, Lanaux TM, Shmalberg JW Comparison of pentobarbitalphenytoin alone vs propofol prior to pentobarbital-phenytoin for euthanasia in 436 client-owned dogs. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio).. 2019; 29:(2)161-165 https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12813

Cook SM, VanDuinen BJ, Love NG, Skerlos SJ Life cycle comparison of environmental emissions from three disposal options for unused pharmaceuticals. Environ Sci Technol.. 2012; 46:(10)5535-5541 https://doi.org/10.1021/es203987b

Guillaume A, Hubatová-Vacková A, Kočí V Environmental impacts of egg production from a life cycle perspective. Agriculture.. 2022; 12 https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12030355

The carbon footprint of general anaesthetics: a case study in the UK. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105411

Jones RS, West E Environmental sustainability in veterinary anaesthesia. Vet Anaesth Analg.. 2019; 46:(4)409-420 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2018.12.008

Kaniyil S, Krishnadas A, Parathody AK, Ramadas KT Financial implications of intravenous anesthetic drug wastage in operation room. Anesth Essays Res.. 2017; 11:(2)304-308 https://doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.186596

Koytcheva MK, Sauerwein LK, Webb TL, Baumgarn SA, Skeels SA, Duncan CG A systematic review of environmental sustainability in veterinary practice. Top Companion Anim Med.. 2021; 44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcam.2021.100550

Lane SF The environmental sustainability of propofol use in daily practice. Br J Anaesth.. 2020; 124:(6)e221-e222 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.009

Leinonen I, Williams AG, Wiseman J, Guy J, Kyriazakis I Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: egg production systems. Poult Sci.. 2012; 91:(1)26-40 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01635

Mankes RF Propofol wastage in anesthesia. Anesth Analg.. 2012; 114:(5)1091-1092 https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824ea491

National Center for Biotechnology Information. Compound summary. 2020. https//pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/propofol#section=Human-Toxicity-Excerpts

Petre MA, Malherbe S Environmentally sustainable perioperative medicine: simple strategies for anesthetic practice. Can J Anaesth.. 2020; 67:(8)1044-1063 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01726-0

Rasheed FN, Walraven G Cleaning up plastics in healthcare waste: the transformative potential of leadership. BMJ Innovations.. 2023; 9:103-108 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2022-000986

Sherman J, Le C, Lamers V, Eckelman M Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of anesthetic drugs. Anesth Analg.. 2012; 114:(5)1086-1090 https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824f6940

Tang MSS, McGain F, Bramley DE, Sheridan NM, Seglenieks R Evaluation of propofol wastage and disposal in routine anesthesia care. Anaesth Intensive Care.. 2023; 51:(2)152-154 https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X221121832

Propofol wastage in anaesthesia: implications and environmental outcomes

02 February 2024
10 mins read
Volume 15 · Issue 1
Figure 1. Waste propofol collected in 1 week.
Figure 1. Waste propofol collected in 1 week.

Abstract

Propofol has been reported as one of the most ‘wasted’ drugs used in both human and veterinary hospitals. This article identifies the amount of propofol being discarded in the veterinary hospital and assesses the implications of doing so. Waste propofol causes both an environmental and financial burden on the hospital. It is essential that wastage in the hospital is managed correctly. It is hoped that by conducting audits such as this, the amount of wastage can be identified and minimised. Mishandling of propofol waste contaminates our waterways and soil, and its carbon footprint needs to be considered. Over-production of any drug just to be wasted uses an excess of unnecessary raw materials. Pressure is being felt by the healthcare profession to minimise the effect it has on the environment; the old ways of thinking are being challenged and changes need to be made.

The environmental impact of veterinary anaesthesia is an increasingly important topic. Some people appear to think that hospitals should ‘get a free pass’ to pollute because of the importance of the job (Rasheed and Walraven, 2023); however, in recent years demand is being placed on healthcare organisations to mitigate and adapt to climate change (Jones and West, 2019). Veterinary professionals have expressed interest in learning new ways to reduce their environmental impact and improve sustainability in veterinary clinics and hospitals (Koytcheva et al, 2021). Propofol is claimed to be the most widely dispensed and wasted drug in both human and veterinary anaesthesia. Reportedly as much as 32–49% of all propofol is wasted (Petre and Malherbe, 2020). Propofol is routinely administered to effect for induction of anaesthesia. This means that the amount drawn up is often not fully administered to the patient and will end up going to waste. This article highlights not only the amount of wastage that is occurring daily in veterinary hospitals by looking at the results of an audit but emphasises the wider implications: from the production of the drug using raw materials to the further reaching consequences wastage has on our environment.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.