References

Aldridge P, O'Dwyer L Nursing the trauma patient. Practical emergency and critical care veterinary nursing.Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2013

Bell S Initial assessment and stabilisation of the head trauma patient. The Veterinary Nurse. 2020; 11:(8)370-374 https://doi.org/10.12968/vetn.2020.11.8.370

Boysen S An overview of the evaluation and treatment of head trauma in small animal patients. Veterinary Ireland Journal. 2015; 380-384

Chiang B, Garcia G, Leverone F, Hernandez JA, Carrera-Justiz S Intraobserver and interobserver agreement of 8 segmental reflexes in healthy dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2024; 38:(2)1101-1110 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16999

de Lahunta A, Glass E, Kent M Visual system. Veterinary neuroanatomy and clinical neurology, 5th edn. Missouri: Elsevier; 2020

Freeman P, Ives E A practical approach to common presentations in general practice. A practical approach to neurology for the small animal practitioner.Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 2020

The practitioner's guide to neurologic causes of canine anisocoria. 2016. https://www.todaysveterinarypractice.com/ophthalmology/the-practitioners-guide-neurologic-causes-canine-anisocoria/ (accessed 10 July 2024)

Neurological examinations; localisation and grading. 2014. https://www.vettimes.co.uk/app/uploads/wp-post-to-pdf-enhanced-cache/1/neurological-examinations-localisation-and-grading.pdf (accessed 10 July 2024)

A logical approach to changed mental status. 2010. https://www.dvm360.com/view/logical-approach-changed-mental-status-proceedings (accessed 10 July 2024)

Platt S, Olby N BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Neurology, 4th edn. Gloucester: British Small Animal Veterinary Association; 2017

Platt S, Garosi L Small animal neurological emergencies.London: Manson Publishing; 2012

The Modified Glasgow Coma Scale. 2016. https://bvns.net/uncategorized/bvns-neurotransmitter-2-0-technically-speaking-september-2016/ (accessed 10 July 2024)

Webb A, Cullen C Ocular manifestations of systemic disease: The dog, 5th edn. In: Gelatt KN (ed). : Wiley-Blackwell; 2013

A veterinary nurse's guide to the Modified Glasgow Coma Scale

02 July 2024
9 mins read
Volume 15 · Issue 6

Abstract

The Modified Glasgow Coma Scale is a resource that was developed to assess and monitor patients with altered neurological status. It incorporates three categories of examination: level of consciousness; motor activity; and brain stem reflexes. Each category is assigned a score from 1–6 and scores are added together giving an overall score of between 3–18. The lower the score, the poorer the prognosis. Scores should be taken at several intervals over a period of time which will provide a trend which gives crucial information to the veterinary team to aid in clinical decision making. The ability to accurately perform the assessment and interpret the results is a skill veterinary nurses can become proficient at and therefore be able to accurately report and discuss patient progress with the veterinary team and clients.

The Modified Glasgow Coma Scale (MGCS) has been adapted from the human Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) which was created in 1974 as an objective way to assess the level of consciousness in humans following a traumatic brain injury and coma. The assessments are performed at initial presentation and repeated several times a day during hospitalisation to monitor the patient for progression of neurological signs (Trub, 2016) (Table 1). The GCS was modified for use in veterinary patients in 1983 by the Chief of Neurosurgery and Neurology as the Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine. The scale was proposed as an objective way to evaluate the neurological status of dogs after traumatic brain injury, assess overall prognosis and evaluate neurological function alongside the neurological examination (Trub, 2016). Although the scale was developed specifically for head trauma patients, it can be used to monitor any patient with changes to level of consciousness, including patients that are quieter than usual to those which are comatose. In these patients, the scale is useful to indicate severity and any improvement or decline of neurological function and can act as a prognostic indicator to advise and inform clinical decisions and communicate prognostic information to owners (Trub, 2016). The three areas the MGCS evaluates are level of consciousness, motor activity and brain stem reflexes and each is given a score between 1 and 6. The evaluation and reasons behind the evaluation are discussed below.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.