References

Bailey PA, Hague BA, Davis M, Major MD, Zubrod CJ, Brakenhoff JE. Incidence of post-anaesthetic colic in non-fasted adult equine patients. The Canadian Veterinary Journal. 2016; 57:(12)1263-6

Bennett CM. Factors that cause bandage complications in equines and how they can be resolved. The Veterinary Nurse. 2017; 8:(3)161-6

Bidwell LA, Brumlage LRB, Rood WA. Equine perioperative fatalities associated with general anaesthesia at a private practice-a retrospective case series. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2007; 34:(1)23-30

Biggi M, Dyson SJ. Use of high-field and low-field magnetic resonance imaging to describe the anatomy of the proximal portion of the tarsal region of nonlame horses. Am J Vet Res. 2018; 79:(3)299-310 https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.79.3.299

Blunden A, Murray RC, Dyson S. Lesions of the deep digital flexor tendon in the digit: a correlative m and post mortem study in control and lame horses. Equine Vet J. 2009; 41:(1)25-33

Bolas N. Basic MRI principles. In: Murray R.C Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 2010

Carney D, Chambers M, Boakye L, Amendola N, Yan A, Hogan M. Osteochondral lesions of the talus. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2018; 28:(2)91-5 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.oto.2018.02.004

Clark-Price SC. Recovery of horses from anaesthesia. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2013; 29:(1)223-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2012.11.001

Corley KTT, Stephen JO. The Equine Hospital Manual.Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008

Daniel AJ, Judy CE, Saveraid T. Magnetic resonance imaging of the metacarpo(tarso)phalangeal region in clinically lame horses responding to diagnostic analgesia of the palmar nerves at the base of the proximal sesamoid bones: Five cases. Equine Veterinary Education. 2013; 25:(5)222-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3292.2011.00246.x

Donnell JR, Frisbie DD, King MR, Goodrich LR, Haussler KK. Comparison of subjective lameness evaluation, force platforms and an inertial-sensor system to identify mild lameness in an equine osteoarthritis model. Vet J. 2015; 206:(2)136-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.08.004

Dyson S, Murray R, Schramme M, Branch M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine foot: 15 horses. Equine Vet J. 2003; 35:(1)18-26

Formica D, Silvestri S. Biological effects of exposure to magnetic resonance imaging: an overview. Biomedical Engineering Online. 2004; 3 https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-3-11

Hallmaq ltd. Hallmarq Standing Equine MRI. 2018. http://www.hallmarq.net/equine/hallmarq-site (accessed 3rd January, 2018)

Jago RC, Corletto F, Wright IM. Peri-anaesthetic complications in an equine referral hospital: Risk factors for post anaesthetic colic. Equine Vet J. 2015; 47:(6)635-40 https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12475

Johnston GM, Taylor PM, Holmes MA, Wood JLN. Confidential enquiry of perioperative equine fatalities. Vet J. 1995; 27:(3)193-200

King KE. How to prepare and position a horse for theatre. The Veterinary Nurse. 2014; 5:(10)588-91

Mair TS, Kinns J, Jones RD, Bolas NM. Magnetic resonance imaging of the distal limb of the standing horse. Equine Veterinary Education. 2010; 17:(2)74-8

Mair TS, Sherlock CE, Blunden A. Clinical and low field magnetic resonance imaging features of osseous cyst-like lesions of the proximal sesamoid bones in seven horses. Equine Veterinary Education. 2016; 30:(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.12558

Michou J, Leece E. Sedation and analgesia in the standing horse 1. drugs used for sedation and systemic analgesia. In Practice. 2012; 34:(9)524-31

Mizobe F, Okada J, Shinzaki Y Use of Standing Low-field Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Oblique Distal Sesamoidean Ligament Desmitis in Three Thoughbred Racehorses. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 2016; 78:(9)1475-80 https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.15-0656

Morgan S. A nursing approach to the equine standing surgical patient. Veterinary Nursing Journal. 2016; 31:(10)308-11

Murray RC, Mair TS, Sherlock CE, Blunden AS. Comparison of high-field and low-field magnetic resonance images of cadaver limbs of horses. Vet Rec. 2009; 165:281-8

Nelson BB, Lordan EE, Hassel DM. Risk factors associated with gastrointestinal dysfunction in horses undergoing elective procedures under general anaesthesia. Equine Vet J. 2013; 45:(45)8-14 https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12162

Reddy U, White MJ, Wilson SR. Anaesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain. 2012; 12:(3)140-4 https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mks002

Senior JM. Morbility, mortatility and risk of general anesthesia in horse. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2013; 29:(1)1-18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2012.11.007

Sherlock CE, Mair TS, Braake FT. Osseous lesions in the metacarpo(tarso) phalangeal joint diagnosed using low-field magnetic resonance imaging in standing horses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2009; 50:(1)13-20

Smith MA. Optimising the use of MRI in the management of foot lameness in the horse. Livestock. 2015a; 20:(5)290-3

Smith M. Diagnosing navicular disease and the role of MRI. Equine Health. 2015b; 1:(24)37-9

Swagemakers JH, Vente C., Mahmoud M. Equine foot mri: past, present and future. Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Husbandry. 2016; 1:(1)104-5

Taylor P, Coumbe K, Henson F, Scott D, Taylor A. Evaluation of sedation for standing clinical procedures in horses using detomidine combined with buprenorphine. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2014; 41:(1)14-24 https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12055

Tranquille CA, Murray RC, Parkin TDH. Can we use subchondral bone thickness on high-field magnetic resonance images to identify thoroughbred racehorses at risk of catastrophic lateral condylar fracture?. Equine Vet J. 2017; 49:(2)167-71 https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12574

Werpy N. Low-field MRI in Horses. In: Murray RC (ed). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 2010

Advanced equine diagnostics — magnetic resonance imaging

02 October 2018
10 mins read
Volume 9 · Issue 8

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become one of the most valuable pieces of diagnostic equipment in equine practice. Both standing and general anaesthetic units are available in the UK, and with growing popularity and public understanding, clinicians have an increased ability to utilise this modality. Considered ‘gold standard’ in terms of lameness diagnostics, MRI is non-invasive and has the capacity to enable precise diagnosis and treatment to be provided. MRI does not use ionising radiation and to date there has been no conclusive evidence to suggest any negative biological hazards associated with its use in patients or technicians. Ensuring the environment the unit is kept in is regulated, with minimal outside radiofrequency interference, and a clear gauss line adhered to, MRI can be calibrated via external services electronically or manually by appropriately trained staff. Patient care and procedural understanding are crucial elements of the veterinary nurse's role; identifying possible complications and implementing nursing interventions appropriately are vital to the successful management of the equine MRI patient.

Lameness is one of the most common issues seen in equine practice, historically complex to diagnose, many practitioners and owners can be frustrated with the ever-eluding causation of lameness. Traditional methods of imaging can be insensitive to subtle changes in the equine patient which can cause significant discomfort. Routine nerve-blocking with local-anaesthetic and lameness assessments alone can be timely, costly, and a painstaking process, which can often leave a lot unanswered. However, over the last decade magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become more accessible and commonly utilised in veterinary diagnostics (Smith, 2015a; Mizobe et al, 2016). Having been the case for years within human medicine, specialist facilities and public perception have aligned to enable practitioners the scope to advance their field and, in turn, provide outstanding quality images and accurate diagnoses; promoting animal welfare (Swagemakers et al, 2016). With the ability to depict bone, tendon, ligament, and other soft tissue lesions including those within the hoof capsule, MRI supersedes the accuracy and detail capability of many other imaging techniques (Dyson et al, 2003) (Figure 1). Within the UK the majority of equine MRI scanners are low-field standing units, with only three high-field general anaesthetic units in the country. Both modalities have opposing merit, however, the field of interest, cost and the holistic presentation of the patient play a vital role in making informed choice between the two (Biggi and Dyson, 2018). Although considered safer, there are still some patient considerations to be addressed when using the lowfield scanners; long periods of sedation and a lack of food and water can lead to a higher probability of gut stasis and impaction (Bailey et al, 2016). Low-field scanners are often limited to the distal limb, due to the structure of the machine and movement artefacts associated with standing sedation. Although movement is alleviated via general anaesthetic in high-field, high-field scanners also have a better capacity to image the proximal limb structures, head, and cervical vertebrae of the horse. However, this is accompanied by the risk of general anaesthesia, which is widely known in horses to carry a high morbidity and mortality risk (Johnston et al, 1995; Senior, 2013).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.