References

Bradshaw JWS Conceptualising the domestic dog – should we start again?. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 2011; 6:(1)95-6

Bradshaw JWS, Blackwell EJ, Casey RA Dominance in domestic dogs: useful construct or bad habit?. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 2009; 4:135-44

Carlson R, 6th edn. : University of Massachusetts; 1998

Casey RA, Loftus B, Bolster C, Richards GJ, Blackwell EJ Human directed aggression in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): occurrence in different contexts and risk factors. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2014; 152:52-63

Dehasse J Sensory, emotional and social development of the young dog. Bulletin for Veterinary Clinical Ethology. 1994; 2:(1–2)6-29

Grandin T, Deesing MJ Genetics and the behaviour of domestic animals.California: Academic Press; 1998

Hedges S: CABI, Oxford; 2014

Hsu Y, Sun L Factors associated with aggressive responses in pet dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2010; 123:108-23

Huizink A, Mulder E, Buitelaar J Prenatal stress and risk for psychopathology: Specific effects or induction of general susceptibility?. Psychological Bulletin. 2004; 130:(1)115-42

Knol BW Behavioural problems in dogs. Veterinary Quarterly. 1987; 9:(3)226-34

Lord K A Comparison of the Sensory Development of Wolves (Canis lupus lupus) and Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). Ethology. 2013; 119:110-20

Miklosi A, Kubinyi E, Topal J, Gacsi M, Viranyi Z, Csanyi V A simple reason for a big difference: Wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Current Biology. 2003; 13:763-6

Norwegian School of Veterinary Science. Canine aggression and genetic control. 2010. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100525090552.htm (accessed 5th January, 2015)

Peterson JB, Shane M The functional neuroanatomy and psychopharmacology of predatory and defensive aggression. In: McCord J Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Books; 2004

Expression Studies on wolves: Captivity Observations. 1946. http://www.davemech.org/schenkel/ (accessed 13th July, 2015)

Shepherd K Behavioural medicine as an integral part of veterinary practice, 2nd edn. In: Horwitz D, Mills DS : Gloucester, BSAVA; 2009

Steinker A Terminology Think Tank: Social dominance theory as it relates to dogs. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 2007; 2:137-40

Advanced approaches to handling dogs in practice

02 July 2015
12 mins read
Volume 6 · Issue 6

Abstract

There have been ground breaking advances in the field of dog training and behaviour modification in the last 20 years. Traditional theories advocating the use of ‘dominance’ to control dog behaviour have given way to ‘force free’ techniques that rely on understanding and changing the dog's motivation. An entirely hands off approach is not realistic in all cases in veterinary practice. However routine application of contemporary behavioural principles to the approach and handling of dogs in practice can improve welfare and reduce defensive aggression for the benefit of both patient and staff alike.

The world of dog training and behaviour has undergone a transformation in the last 20 years. Traditionally it was believed that dogs live in linear dominance hierarchies and so the way to control dog behaviour was to assert yourself as ‘pack leader’. In its milder form this involved always walking ahead of the dog on walks or through doorways, eating first and not allowing the dog to be higher than you or to sleep on furniture. Harsher approaches suggested correcting or physically punishing the dog for trying to eat first, walk ahead or sleep on a sofa, or any other threatening or non-threatening but unwanted behaviour, as this was believed to be an attempt to challenge for the role of ‘alpha’. At its extreme it often included a recommendation that the owner ‘alpha roll’ the dog by pinning him on his side until he ‘submitted’ (Steinker, 2007).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.