References

Abbitt G Legal, ethical and professional issues for veterinary nurses. The Veterinary Nurse. 2011; 1:(3)186-8

Animal Welfare Act. 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/45/pdfs/ukpga_20060045_en.pdf, (Accessed on: 22/02/15)

Branscombe L Keeping it legal: delegation to veterinary nurses. In Practice. 2012; 34:52-3

Budd C Aspects of employee drug abuse in veterinary practice. Veterinary Nursing Journal. 2012; 27:112-14

Canning E The ethical, legal and professional implications of the frequency of inpatient checks during out of hours hospitalization. The Veterinary Nurse. 2012; 3:(8)517-20

Crump L Ethical dilemmas: who can decide when euthanasia is justified?. The Veterinary Nurse. 2013; 4:(1)4-11

Dye K Consent to treatment in veterinary practice. In: Pullen S, Gray C London: Elsevier; 2006

Earle E Negligence and whistle-blowing. In: Pullen S, Gray C London: Elsevier; 2006

Grey C, Wilson K Introduction to the legal system. In: Pullen S, Gray C London: Elsevier; 2006

Harvey L, Ladyman R, Farnworth M International differences in the journey toward compulsory veterinary nurse registration. The Veterinary Nurse. 2014; 5:(9)538-42

Veterinary Nurses and The Law. 2015. http://www.thewe-binarvet.com/webinar/veterinary-nurses-and-the-law/ (accessed 27/th February, 2015)

Mann A Ethics and the RVN – why should we be concerned?. The Veterinary Nurse. 2013; 4:(4)198-201

Orpet H Celebrations — a new Royal Charter!. The Veterinary Nurse. 2015; 5:(10)

Pullen S, Wright AJ, Cooper B Professional responsibilities, regulation and the ethics of veterinary nursing. In: Cooper B, Mullineaux E, Turner L Gloucester: BSAVA; 2011

RCVS. ‘New Royal Charter comes into effect’. 2015. http://www.rcvs.org.uk/news-and-events/news/new-royal-charter-comes-into-effect/, (Accessed on 1/03/15)

Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. Code of Professional Conduct for Veterinary Nurses. 2015. http://www.rcvs.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/code-of-professional-conduct-for-veterinary-nurses/ (accessed 22nd February, 2015)

Reid-Searl K, Moxham L, Walker S, Happell B Shifting supervision: implications for safe administration of medication by nursing students. J Clin Nurs. 2008; 27:2750-7

Reid-Searl K, Happell B Supervising nursing students administering medication: a perspective from registered nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2012; 21:1998-2005

Rollin BEOxford: Blackwell; 2006

Veterinary Surgeons Act. 1966. http://www.leg-islation.gov.uk/ukp-ga/1966/36 (accessed 22nd February 2015)

Webb J, Welsh P, Whiting M A case-based approach to professional and legal issues. The Veterinary Nurse. 2013; 4:(6)358-62

Wood S The professional, legal and ethical issues in VN: a scenario. The Veterinary Nurse. 2011; 2:(3)164-8

Ethical, legal and professional implications of student veterinary nurses working lone shifts

02 February 2016
10 mins read
Volume 7 · Issue 1

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine the ethical dilemma of student veterinary nurses (SNVs) working lone shifts. The article outlines the implications of SVNs undertaking duties outside the realms of the Veterinary Surgeons Act (1966) Schedule 3. Criminal, civil and professional consequences of such actions are explored with the aid of theoretical explanations. Finally the article recognises that SVNs are not substitutes for registered veterinary nurses and that using them as substitutes will bring about a series of ethical implications.

A student veterinary nurse (SVN) is defined within the Veterinary Surgeons Act (1966), Schedule 3, as a person enrolled, under the registration rules, with the RCVS for the purpose of undergoing training as a veterinary nurse at an approved training centre or an approved veterinary practice (Kissick and Hockey, 2015). Branscombe (2012) highlighted how within Schedule 3 there are safeguards in place to enable veterinary surgeons (VS) and registered veterinary nurses (RVNs) to train SVNs. These include permitting a SVN that is employed or on a placement in a training practice to give medical treatments to an animal under their supervision. Within a veterinary context, the meaning of ‘direction’ is understood to be when the VS instructs the person (RVN or SVN) as to the activity but is not necessarily present. Whereas, ‘supervision’ is when the VS or RVN is present on the premises and is able to assist if required (Kissick and Hockey, 2015). Under the Veterinary Surgeons Act (1966), Schedule 3, a SVN should be supervised by a VS or RVN when performing medical treatments, or should, at the least, ensure that there is a VS or RVN on the premises, available to assist the SVN if needed. This differs from human nursing where all student nurses are only permitted to administer medications when under the personal supervision of an authorised person, such as a registered nurse (Reid-Searl et al, 2008). It is important to note that if an RVN is supervising a SVN this is done so under the direction of a VS and any minor surgery, such as suturing, must be done under constant, direct and personal supervision from the VS (Pullen et al, 2011; Branscombe, 2012) (Figure 1). However, as with human nursing, it could be argued that the requirement of SVNs working lone shifts or carrying out procedures without supervision occurs mainly when VS and RVNs are busy (Reid-Searl et al, 2008). The ethical implications that may be encountered regarding SVNs working outside the realms of Schedule 3 are outlined below.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.