Reducing sharps injuries in veterinary practice

17 December 2013
4 mins read
Volume 4 · Issue 10

Abstract

Sharps are used in the veterinary environment on a daily basis. The NHS European Office (2013) has recently changed the guidelines to sharps, to reduce the number of incidents occurring and the costs involved from related injuries causing time off for sickness, from counselling and from tests in the NHS for blood-borne pathogens. There is little evidence on the number of needle-stick injuries in veterinary practice in the UK compared with in America, Canada, Australia and in the NHS. This article highlights alternative consumable devices that can be used in place of sharps to protect staff in veterinary practice, the correct and safe disposal of sharps and the risks involved with the use of sharps.

The handling of sharp objects in veterinary practice is common procedure; veterinarians and veterinary nurses are required to administer injections, place catheters and take blood samples. Surgical procedures are performed using blades and sharp instruments; many consumable materials are of hard plastics, which also have the potential to cause injury. Thus all uses of sharps need to be approached in a mature and responsible manner (Department of Health, 2013; Health and Safety Executive (HSE), 2013a).

In practice, a common term for percutaneous injury is ‘needle-stick injury’. A needle-stick injury or sharps injury is when the sharp item penetrates the skin. Anxiety and concerns about adverse effects are at the forefront as a result of skin penetration and the potential exposure to infectious disease agents from the sharps (Horsburgh and Mahon, 2008), especially if the sharps are contaminated with medicines or blood.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.