References

Arkes HR. Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways to minimize their impact. J Consult Clin Psychol.. 1981; 49:(3)323-30 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.49.3.323

Banning M. A review of clinical decision making: models and current research. J Clin Nurs.. 2008; 17:(2)187-95

Brown R. Gut instinct and clinical decision making. Vet Rec.. 2015; 177:(9)237.1-237 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.h4703

Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med.. 1999; 49:(5)651-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00145-8

Cochrane Library. 2019. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/ (accessed 6 November 2019)

Coe JB, Adams CL, Bonnett BN. A focus group study of veterinarians' and pet owners' perceptions of veterinarian-client communication in companion animal practice. J Am Vet Med Assoc.. 2008; 233:(7)1072-80 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.233.7.1072

Cornell KK, Kopcha M. Client-veterinarian communication: skills for client centered dialogue and shared decision making. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract.. 2007; 37:(1)37-47 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2006.10.005

Croskerry P. Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decisionmaking. Ann Emerg Med.. 2003; 41:(1)110-20 https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2003.22

Dean R, Mackway-Jones K, Wareham K, Grindlay D, Brennan M. BestBETs for Vets: a way to improve the odds of delivering high-quality care. Vet Rec.. 2015; 176:(14)354-6 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.h1593

Fischhoff B. Debiasing, 24th edn. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. (editors). New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 1982

Fontaine SJ. The role of reflective practice in professional development. The Veterinary Nurse. 2018; 9:(7)340-7 https://doi.org/10.12968/vetn.2018.9.7.340

Gawande AA, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery. 2003; 133:(6)614-21 https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2003.169

Hall JA, Dornan MC. Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction levels. Soc Sci Med.. 1988; 27:(6)637-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(88)90012-3

Iqbal IZ, Kara N, Hartley C. Gut instinct: a diagnostic tool?. J Laryngol Otol.. 2015; 129:(4)365-8 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215115000614

International Renal Interest Society. IRIS staging of CKD. 2017. http://www.iris-kidney.com/pdf/IRIS_2017_Staging_of_CKD_09May18.pdf (accessed 6 November 2019)

Jeffery N. Liberating the (data) population from subjugation to the 5% (P-value). J Small Anim Pract.. 2015; 56:(8)483-4 https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.12391

Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Edwards A Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme. BMJ.. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1744

Kahneman D. Thinking fast and slow.St Ives: Penguin Books; 2011

Kanji N, Coe JB, Adams CL, Shaw JR. Effect of veterinarian-client-patient interactions on client adherence to dentistry and surgery recommendations in companion-animal practice. J Am Vet Med Assoc.. 2012; 240:(4)427-36 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.240.4.427

Being nice is not enough - exploring relationship-centered veterinary care with structural equation modelling. A quantitative study on german pet owners' perception. 2019. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2019.00056/full (accessed 6 November 2019)

Levinson W. Physician-Patient Communication. JAMA.. 1994; 272:(20)1619-1620 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520200075039

Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA.. 1997; 277:(7)553-9 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540310051034

May SA. Clinical reasoning and case-based decision making: the fundamental challenge to veterinary educators. J Vet Med Educ.. 2013; 40:(3)200-9 https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0113-008R

Clinical decision making 1. 2011. https://veterinary-practice.com/article/clinical-decision-making-1 (accessed 6 November 2019)

McKenzie BA. Veterinary clinical decision-making: cognitive biases, external constraints, and strategies for improvement. J Am Vet Med Assoc.. 2014; 244:(3)271-6 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.244.3.271

Mosedale P. Learning from mistakes: the use of significant event audit in veterinary practice. The Veterinary Nurse. 2018; 9:(5)236-9 https://doi.org/10.12968/vetn.2018.9.5.236

Mosedale P. Clinical audit in veterinary practice—the role of the veterinary nurse. The Veterinary Nurse. 2019; 10:(1)4-10 https://doi.org/10.12968/vetn.2019.10.1.4

NHS England. Why is shared decision making important?. 2019. https://www.england.nhs.uk/shared-decision-making/why-is-shared-decisionmaking-important/ (accessed 6 November 2019)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Improving health and social care through evidence-based guidance. 2019. https://www.nice.org.uk/ (accessed 6 November 2019)

Oxtoby C, Mossop L. Implementing checklists in practice. In Pract.. 2016; 38:(9)463-4 https://doi.org/10.1136/inp.i4700

Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. Practice Standards Scheme. 2018. https://www.rcvs.org.uk/setting-standards/practice-standards-scheme/ (accessed 13 November 2019)

Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. Quality improvement. 2019. https://knowledge.rcvs.org.uk/quality-improvement/ (accessed 6 November 2019)

Recover. Recover initiative. 2019. https://recoverinitiative.org/ (accessed 6 November 2019)

Sox HC, Higgins MC, Owens DK. Medical decision making.West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell; 2013

Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ.. 1995; 152:(9)1423-33

Treadwell JR, Lucas S, Tsou AY. Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation. BMJ Qual Saf.. 2014; 23:(4)299-318 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001797

van den Bruel A, Thompson M, Buntinx E, Mant D. Clinicians' gut feeling about serious infections in children: observational study. BMJ.. 2012; 2012:(345) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6144

Veterinary Evidence. Latest articles. 2019. https://www.veterinaryevidence.org/inde1x.php/ve (accessed 6 November 2019)

VetSet2Go Project. Relationship-centred care. 2018. https://www.vetset2go.edu.au/modules/vetset2go/content/relationship-centred-care.pdf (accessed 6 November 2019)

An overview of decision making in veterinary nursing

02 November 2019
10 mins read
Volume 10 · Issue 9

Abstract

Decision making takes place in all aspects of veterinary care. Throughout any consultation, work up, hospitalisation or ongoing home care, decisions need to be made about the next step to be taken. Clinical decision making is influenced by many different factors including past experience, emotions, owner wishes, financial concerns and communication skills. Within the veterinary team, it is important that everyone understands the factors influencing decisions. Decision making can follow a paternalistic, guardian or shared approach, which tends to be dominant in veterinary practice. Where practices adopt standard operating procedures, the use of clinical evidence and clear non-biased decisions need to be made.

Making decisions is something that everyone does all day, every day: what to wear when going out, how to travel when going on holiday or what to have for lunch all require decision making. Decisions are also made in practice, but involve owners, opinions of colleagues and clinical evidence. Some decisions will be made instantly; others may take more time. In both situations, it is important to understand how those decisions are made.

When working with patients, you are continuously deciding on how to treat and care for them. You need to consider the clinical presentation, the way they respond to treatment, the evidence base, practice protocols, possible side effects and costs — to name a few factors — but it is important to stop and think about how you make those decisions. Clinical decisions may be based on practice protocol, the latest evidence, or personal experience. Where protocols or standard operating procedures (SOPs) are implemented, there needs to be an awareness of how these were developed. There needs to be an awareness amongst the end users of the decision making process that was applied to develop those protocols. Clarity and transparency of the methodology, training for the people sitting on such review panels and any conflicts of interest need to be acknowledged to ensure that all decisions are based on valid, reliable and current information.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.