References

Barach P, Small SD. Clinical review - Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from. BMJ. 2000; 320:759-763 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.759

Batalden PB, Davidoff F. What is ‘quality improvement’ and how can it transform healthcare?. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007; 16:(1)2-3 https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.022046

Braithwaite J, Herkes J, Ludlow K, Testa L, Lamprell G. Association between organisational and workplace cultures, and patient outcomes: Systematic review. BMJ Open. 2017; 7:(11) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017708

Card AJ. The problem with ‘5 whys’. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017; 26:(8)671-677 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005849

Contributory factors checklist. RCVS Knowledge. https://knowledge.rcvs.org.uk/document-library/contributory-factors-checklist/ (January 9, 2022)

Quality improvement made simple. What everyone should know about health care quality improvement. 2021a; https://doi.org/10.37829/HF-2021-I05

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. 5 Whys: finding the root cause. http://www.ihi.org/resources/pages/tools/5-whys-finding-the-root-cause.aspx (accessed September 19 2021)

Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century.Washington DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2001

Katz D, Blasius K, Isaak R Exposure to incivility hinders clinical performance in a simulated operative crisis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019; 28:(9)750-757 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009598

Leonard M, Graham S, Bonacum D. The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13:(Suppl 1)i85-90 https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i85

Mannion R, Davies H. Understanding organisational culture for healthcare quality improvement. BMJ. 2018; 363 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4907

McMillan M. Checklists in veterinary anaesthesia: why bother?. Vet Rec. 2014; 175:(22)556-559 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.g7515

Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC. Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J Organ Behav. 2006; 27:(7)941-966 https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413

Oxtoby C. Patient safety: the elephant in the room. J Small Anim Pract. 2014; 55:(8)389-390 https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.12252

Oxtoby C, Ferguson E, White K, Mossop L. We need to talk about error: causes and types of error in veterinary practice. Vet Rec. 2015; 177:(17) https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.103331

Patient Safety Network. Adverse events, near misses, and errors. 2019. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/adverse-events-near-misses-and-errors (accessed August 2 2021)

Pringle M. Significant event auditing - now part of general practice. Prescriber. 2009; 20:(2)6-8 https://doi.org/10.1002/psb.465

Reason J. Understanding adverse events: human factors. Qual Health Care. 1995; 4:(2)80-9 https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.4.2.80

Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000; 320:(7237)768-770 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768

Riskin A, Erez A, Foulk TA The Impact of Rudeness on Medical Team Performance: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics. 2015; 136:(3)487-495 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-1385

Rooke F, Burford J, Doorly A, Gush C, Brennan ML. Developing consensus for definitions of key veterinary-specific quality improvement (QI) terms using an eDelphi-study method. Vet Rec. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.1174

RCVS Knowledge. Continuous quality improvement: a roadmap for the veterinary professions. https://knowledge.rcvs.org.uk/document-library/continuous-quality-improvement-a-roadmap-for-the-veterinary/ (accessed May 19 2020)

RCVS Knowledge. Quality improvement. https://knowledge.rcvs.org.uk/quality-improvement/ (accessed February 19 2020)

RCVS Knowledge. Significant event audit. https://knowledge.rcvs.org.uk/quality-improvement/tools-and-resources/significant-event-audit/ (accessed January 9 2022)

RCVS Knowledge. Cause and effect (Fishbone) diagram. https://knowledge.rcvs.org.uk/document-library/fishbone-diagram/?preview=true (accessed January 9 2022)

RCVS Knowledge. The lifesaving power of checklists: what you need to know now. https://knowledge.rcvs.org.uk/news-and-events/features/safety-checklists/ (accessed January 9 2022)

How doctors in senior leadership roles establish and maintain a positive patient-centred culture. 2019. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/how-doctors-in-senior-leadership-roles-establish-and-maintain-a-positive-patient-centred-cu-79633866.pdf

The King's Fund. Compassionate and inclusive leadership. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/audio-video/compassionate-inclusive-leadershipevent (accessed 9 January 2022)

van Klei WA, Hoff RG, van Aarnhem EEHL Effects of the introduction of the WHO ‘Surgical Safety Checklist’ on in-hospital mortality: a cohort study. Ann Surg. 2012; 255:(1)44-49 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823779ae

Viner B. Using audit to improve clinical effectiveness. In Pract. 2009; 31:(5)240-243 https://doi.org/10.1136/inpract.31.5.240

Quality improvement for patient safety and a better practice culture

02 May 2022
13 mins read
Volume 13 · Issue 4
Figure 1. The relationship between patient safety, quality improvement and culture in veterinary practice. Patient safety is part of quality improvement, which in turn, contributes to practice culture.

Abstract

This article explores the subjects of quality improvement, patient safety and practice culture, and the relationships between them. These subjects are highly relevant to the care that patients receive — learning more about them can improve our ability to treat animals effectively. A positive practice culture is one that encourages civility, teamwork, a blame-free attitude to errors, and a learning approach for the whole team. Quality improvement is a mechanism to improve standards of care — it helps patient safety and supports a positive practice culture. Quality improvement can be defined as the combined efforts of the whole team to make changes that will lead to better patient outcomes, better system performance (care) and better professional development (learning). Quality improvement methods, such as clinical audits and significant event audits, and quality improvement tools such as guidelines, checklists and systems of work, can help veterinary practices to make a start with quality improvement, and engaging with these quality improvement tools can help improve patient safety and practice culture to benefit all team members.

The terms quality improvement, patient safety and practice culture are increasingly being used in the context of veterinary care. But what are they? Although these subjects do not form a major part of college or university curriculums they are nevertheless highly relevant to the care that patients receive — learning more about them can improve our ability to treat pets effectively. We will start by discussing ‘practice culture.’

A common definition of culture is ’the way things are done around here’ (Braithwaite et al, 2017). In veterinary practice, culture describes a group of attitudes, beliefs and behaviours that team members share (Braithwaite et al, 2017). This might be a rule that everyone adheres to — perhaps, following a surgical safety checklist — or more subtle cues about what is or is not acceptable (Mannion and Davies, 2018). So, it covers a broad range of things from the obvious to the opaque. Another way of thinking about culture is to consider the attitudes, beliefs and behaviours we are likely to find in a positive culture:

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.