References

Al Khalifah K, Brindhaban A Comparison between conventional radiography and digital radiography for various kVp and mAs settings using a pelvic phantom. Radiography. 2004; 10:119-25

Al Khalifah K, Brindhaban A, Dashti A, Kandari L, Kandari A Effect of Heat on Image Plates in Computed Radiography Systems. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 2012; 43:11-15

Baker MA Investigation into factors affecting Fuji S-value using an extremity phantom. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 2012; 43:34-7

Carter C, Veale BMissouri: Mosby, Inc; 2010

Kowalczyk N, Comer E Exposure indicator degradation from CR plate processing delays. Radiologic Technology. 2009; 80:401-9

10 kVp rule – An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom imaging study using a CR system: Impact on image quality and effective dose using AEC and manual mode. 2014. http://www.radiographyonline.com/article/S1078-8174(14)00054-6/fulltext (accessed 1st July, 2014)

Lo WY, Hornof WJ, Zwingen-berger AL, Robertson ID Multiscale image processing and antiscatter grids in digital radiography. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound. 2009; 50:569-76

Ma WK, Hogg P, Tootel A Anthropomorphic chest phantom imaging — The potential for dose creep in computed radiography. Radiography. 2013; 19:207-11

Meredith WJ, Massey JBLondon: John Wright and Sons Ltd; 1983

Pongnapang N Practical guidelines for radiographers to improve computed radiography image quality. Biomed Imaging and Intervention Journal. 2005; 1:(2)

Seeram ENew York: Delmar Cengage Learning; 2011

Seeram E The new exposure indicator for digital radiography. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 2014; 45:144-58

Warren-Forward H, Hobson L, Skinner R An assessment of exposure indices in computed tomography for the posterior-anterior chest and the lateral lumbar spine. Br J Radiol. 2007; 80:26-31

Using computed radiography — how does it compare to film-screen radiography?

02 December 2014
11 mins read
Volume 5 · Issue 10
Figure 1. Effect of exposure on image quality for digital radiography. a) With an appropriate exposure good bony detail is seen. b) Underexposure results in an image which is grainy or mottled in appearance. Note the brightness and contrast is acceptable but detail is lost.
Figure 1. Effect of exposure on image quality for digital radiography. a) With an appropriate exposure good bony detail is seen. b) Underexposure results in an image which is grainy or mottled in appearance. Note the brightness and contrast is acceptable but detail is lost.

Abstract

Many veterinary practices have recently switched from using film-screen (plain film) radiography to computed radiography (CR). Due to the number of inherent differences between the two modalities, there are many new factors to understand in order to get the most out of a CR system and to work safely. While there is no substitute for proper training on any new piece of equipment, this article explains the most important differences between film-screen radiography and CR, enabling veterinary nurses to apply a greater degree of knowledge when using CR. Learning how CR works and the methods needed to use it properly will result in optimised image quality and better safety for staff and patients.

Many veterinary practices have recently switched from using film-screen (plain film) radiography to computed radiography (CR). Practice managers have been relatively quick to recognise the benefits associated with using CR, many of which are financial considerations. Outwardly these two modalities appear similar, with both employing a removable cassette which has to be inserted into a processing machine. However, working with CR is not as simple as it seems. Due to the number of inherent differences between the two modalities, there are many new factors to understand in order to get the most out of a CR system and to work safely. While there is no substitute for proper training on any new piece of equipment, the purpose of this article is to explain the most important differences between film-screen radiography and CR, enabling the veterinary nurse to apply a greater degree of knowledge when using CR.

If plain film packets are incorrectly filed it may take a long time to locate them. Films may also get lost, especially if sent in the post or if filed incorrectly. In these cases there is sometimes no alternative but to rely on the written report — if there is one — or to re-radiograph the patient. Virtually all of the problems associated with archiving plain film radiographs are overcome when using CR. The amount of space required is vastly reduced, and it takes only a few seconds to retrieve digital images from a digital archive or PACS system. Another benefit of CR is that it allows people to access the images from different locations at the same time. It is also virtually impossible to lose a CR image, and although computer systems have been known to fail on the odd occasion, regularly backing up the system up by disc can negate this concern. Being able to send or access images via the internet has the obvious advantage of convenience and time, and has led to the practice of teleradiology whereby images are reported remotely by a radiologist. This is a huge benefit for remote practices and those clinicians working out of hours.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.