References

Daugherty Biddison EL, Paine L, Murakami P, Herzke C, Weaver SJ Associations between safety culture and employee engagement over time: a retrospective analysis. BMJ Qual Saf.. 2016; 25:(1)31-37 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003910

Foote A Moral distress, compassion fatigue and burn-out in veterinary practice. The Veterinary Nurse.. 2000; 11:(7)292-295 https://doi.org/10.12968/vetn.2020.11.7.292

George M Stress in NHS staff triggers defensive inward-focussing and an associated loss of connection with colleagues: this is reversed by Schwartz Rounds. Journal of Compassionate Healthcare.. 2016; 3:(9) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40639-016-0025-8

Gibson J, White K, Mossop L, Oxtoby C, Brennan M ‘We're gonna end up scared to do anything’: a qualitative exploration of how client complaints are experienced by UK veterinary practitioners. Vet Rec.. 2022; 191:(4) https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.1737

Kim SS, Kaplowitz S, Johnston MV The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance. Eval Health Prof.. 2004; 27:(3)237-251 https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278704267037

Lown BA, Manning CF The Schwartz Center Rounds: evaluation of an interdisciplinary approach to enhancing patient-centered communication, teamwork, and provider support. Acad Med.. 2010; 85:(6)1073-1081 https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181dbf741

Maben J, Adams M, Peccei R, Murrells T, Robert G ‘Poppets and parcels’: the links between staff experience of work and acutely ill older peoples’ experience of hospital care. Int J Older People Nurs.. 2012; 7:(2)83-94 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-3743.2012.00326.x

Maben J, Taylor C, Dawson JSouthampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2018

Maben J, Taylor C, Reynolds E, McCarthy I, Leamy M Realist evaluation of Schwartz Rounds® for enhancing the delivery of compassionate healthcare: understanding how they work, for whom, and in what contexts. BMC Health Serv Res.. 2021; 21:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06483-4

Martin A How Schwartz Rounds can support the wellbeing of veterinary teams. Veterinary Nursing Journal.. 2022; 37:(5)6-13

Moses L, Malowney MJ, Wesley Boyd J Ethical conflict and moral distress in veterinary practice: A survey of North American veterinarians. J Vet Intern Med.. 2018; 32:(6)2115-2122 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15315

Reed E, Cullen A, Gannon C, Knight A, Todd J Use of Schwartz Centre Rounds in a UK hospice: Findings from a longitudinal evaluation. J Interprof Care.. 2015; 29:(4)365-366 https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.983594

Safran DG, Miller W, Beckman H Organizational dimensions of relationship-centered care. Theory, evidence, and practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21:(Suppl 1)S9-S15 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00303.x

Thompson A How Schwartz Rounds can be used to combat compassion fatigue. Nurs Manag (Harrow).. 2013; 20:(4)16-20 https://doi.org/10.7748/nm2013.07.20.4.16.e1102

Weiss R, Vittinghoff E, Fang MC Associations of physician empathy with patient anxiety and ratings of communication in hospital admission encounters. J Hosp Med.. 2017; 12:(10)805-810 https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.2828

Whitehead PB, Locklear TM, Carter KF A Longitudinal study of the impact of Schwartz Center Rounds on moral distress. J Nurs Adm.. 2021; 51:(7-8)409-415 https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001037

Retrospective review of a Schwartz Rounds service for a veterinary team

02 February 2024
13 mins read
Volume 15 · Issue 1

Abstract

Schwartz Rounds are a multidisciplinary forum for human healthcare staff to process the emotional and social issues associated with delivering care. The aim is to care for the emotional needs of team members so that they in turn may attend to the emotional needs of their patients (clients).

Aim:

To run a pilot program at a large UK veterinary practice to assess the suitability and impact of Schwartz Rounds in this group.

Method:

Data analysis of feedback forms and attendance records from Schwartz Rounds in veterinary practice.

Results:

Over 90% of attendees found that the stories presented were: relevant to their daily work; would help them work better with colleagues; found the group discussion helpful; and had a better understanding of their work. Over 90% planned to attend again and recommend Schwartz Rounds to colleagues.

Conclusions:

The pilot provided sufficient quantitative evidence that Schwartz Rounds increase the wellbeing of practice teams to warrant further investigations.

Schwartz Rounds were set up by the Center for Compassionate Care in memory of Kenneth Schwartz, a medical attorney who developed terminal lung cancer. He noted that it was the moments of compassion shown by healthcare teams which meant the most to him during his treatment. The premise of Schwartz Rounds is that, in order to offer compassionate care to patients, healthcare teams need to be offered the same (Firth-Cozens and Cornwell, 2009). Noting the evidence in human-centred healthcare settings for Schwartz Rounds, transferability into the veterinary setting needs to be understood. As veterinary professionals experiencing compassion fatigue may have a reduced empathy for coworkers, this can result in reduced quality of care (Foote, 2000). Schwartz Rounds can provide a countercultural or third space for teams, which gives attendees a forum to reflect in a group setting.

Rounds usually last 1 hour, have two trained facilitators (who introduce and set the parameters of the Round) and two panellists, who start the reflective discussion by recounting experiences from their daily working lives. Audience members are invited to reflect as the stories stimulate similar memories or experiences – food is provided as part of the format of the Round (Martin, 2022).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.