Bhalla A, Aron DC, Donskey CJ. Staphylococcus aureus intestinal colonization is associated with increased frequency of S. aureus on skin of hospitalized patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2007; 7

Carling PC, Bartley JM. Evaluating hygienic cleaning in health care settings: what you do not know can harm your patients. Am J Infect Control. 2010; 38:(5)S41-50

Casewell MW. The role of hands in nosocomial gram-negative infection. In: Maibach HI, Aly R (eds). New York, NY: Skin Microbiology Springer; 1981

Cure L, Van Enk R. Effect of hand sanitizer location on hand hygiene compliance. Am J Infect Control. 2015; 43:(9)917-21

Kampf G. The six golden rules to improve compliance in hand hygiene. J Hosp Infect. 2004; 56:S3-5

Kampf G, Reichel M, Feil Y, Eggerstedt S, Kaulfers PM. Influence of rub-in technique on required application time and hand coverage in hygienic hand disinfection. BMC Infect Dis. 2008; 8

Larson E.L., McGinley K.J., Foglia A.R., Talbot G.H., Leyden J.J. Composition and antimicrobic resistance of skin flora in hospitalized and healthy adults. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1986; 23:(3)604-608

Lee K. World Health Organization. In: Sperling J (ed). : Edward Elgar Publishing; 2014

Randle J, Clarke M, Storr J. Hand hygiene compliance in healthcare workers. J Hosp Infect. 2006; 64:(3)205-9

Ruple A, Slovis NM, Jones G. What is infection control and biosecurity. In: Caveney L, Jones B, Ellis K (eds). : John Wiley & Sons; 2011

Sax H, Allegranzi B, Uçkay I, Larson E, Boyce J, Pittet D. ‘My five moments for hand hygiene’: a user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene. J Hosp Infect. 2007; 67:(1)9-21

Stull JW, Weese JS. Hospital-associated infections in small animal practice. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2015; 45:(2)217-233

World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care: first global patient safety challenge clean care is safer care. 2009. (accessed 7 December 2021)

Considerations for hand hygiene to reduce hospital acquired infections in practice

02 December 2021
7 mins read
Volume 12 · Issue 10
Figure 1.


As veterinary nurses, our role as set out in the professional conduct guidance by the RCVS states that when providing care, veterinary surgeons and veterinary nurses should ‘ensure a hygienic and safe environment’.

This means that we should actively contribute to the careful consideration of day-to-day practices within the clinic that safeguard patients to ensure that when they enter they clinics, they are not exposed to increased risk from infection. Understanding the need for good hand hygiene in clinic, along with the appropriate considerations, means that we are able to implement good practice.

Infection prevention and control (IPC) is the name commonly given to the practice of implementing strategies to keep the risk to patients entering clinics as low as possible, by preventing them from acquiring an infection during their stay (Ruple et al, 2011).

The foundation of any good IPC system in practice must include a hand hygiene strategy as, without it, all other parts of the system will fail. Infection can be defined as the entry and multiplication of microorganisms to cause clinical, subclinical, colonising or latent infection (Ruple et al, 2011). Urinary tract infections, pneumonia, bloodstream infections, surgical site infections, and gastrointestinal infection are among the most commonly identified infections that can occur in the veterinary setting (Stull and Weese, 2015). While the environmental area that a patient is housed within or operated on must be kept as clean as possible to reduce the risk, the real prevention mechanism to stop the microorganisms being transferred from surface to patient, equipment to patient or patient to patient, is appropriate hand hygiene.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.