References

Aly R, Malbach HI Comparitive antibacterial efficacy of a 2 minute surgical scrub with Chlorhexidine Gluconate, povidone iodine and chloroxylenol sponge brushes. Am J Infect Control. 1988; 16:(4)173-7

Boyce JM, Pittet D Guideline for hand hygiene in healthcare settings.. Center for Disease control and Prevention weekly report. 2002; 51:(16)1-45

Carro C, Camilleri L, Traore O An in-use microbiological comaprison of two surgical hand disinfection techniques in cardiothoracic surgery: hand rubbing versis hand scrubbing. J Hosp Infect. 2007; 67:(1)62-6

Fossum T. Small animal surgery.Missouri: Elsevier; 2007

Kampf G, Osteomeyer C, Heeg P Surgical hand disinfection with a propanol based hand rub: equivalence or shorter application times. J Hosp Infect. 2005; 59:(4)304-10

Kikuchi-Numagami K, Saishu T, Fukaya M, Kanazawa E, Tagami H Irritancy of scrubbing up for surgery with or without a brush. Acta derm venereol. 1999; 79:(3)230-2

Misteli H, Weber WP, Reck S Surgical glove perforation and the risk of surgical site infection. J Am Med Assoc. 2009; 144:(6)553-8

O'Shaughnessy M, O'Malley VP, Corbett G, Given HF Optimum duration of surgical scrub time. Br J Surg. 1991; 78:(6)685-6

Parienti JJ, Thibon P, Heller R Hand rubbing with an aqueous alcoholic solution versus traditional surgical hand scrubbing and 30 day surgical site infection rates: a randonmised equivalence study. JAMA. 2002; 288:(6)722-7

Pietsch H. Hand antiseptics: rubs, versus scrubs, alcoholic solutions versus alcoholic gels. J Hosp Infect. 2001; 48:S33-6

Shen NJ, Pan SC, Sheng WH Comparitive antimicrobial efficacy of alcohol based hand rub and conventional surgical scrub in a medical center. Journal of microbiology, immunology and infection.. 2015; 48:(6)322-8

Suchomel M, Gnat G, Weinlich M, Rotter M Surgical hand disinfection using alcohol: the effects of alcohol type, mode and duration of action. J Hosp Infect. 2009; 71:(3)228-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2008.11.006

Verwilghen D, Grulke S, Kampf G Presurgical hand antisepsis: Concepts and current habits of veterinary surgeons. Vet Surg. 2011; 40:(5)515-21 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00846.x

Verwilghen DR, Mainil J, Mastrocicco E Surgical hand antisepsis in veterinary practice: Evaluation of soap scrubs and alcohol based rub techniques. Vet J.. 2011; 190:(3)372-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.12.020

Widmer AF Surgical hand hygeine: scrub or rub?. J Hosp Infect. 2013; 83:S35-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6701(13)60008-0

Pre surgical hand preparation: moving from tradition

02 October 2016
10 mins read
Volume 7 · Issue 8

Abstract

The theory of pre surgical hand preparation dates back centuries, and the same basic principles remain today. However, the historical methods of using a scrubbing brush with certain soap-based products has been proven to irritate the skin on hands making it somewhat counterproductive. An alternative, alcohol hand rub, has been found to be superior to traditional hand scrubs with studies showing that this is the case. This article takes the reader through the evidence that might enable for a change to the current practice of pre surgical hand preparation.

The notion of washing hands before carrying out surgical procedures was introduced by Lister in the late 18th century. He found that there were fewer infections when surgeons washed their hands with an antiseptic agent before carrying out a procedure (Boyce and Pittet, 2002). At the time the antiseptic used was carbolic acid and, although thankfully no longer accepted practice, the hand hygiene theory still remains strongly today.

Bacteria on the skin can be divided into two groups, residual and transient. Residual bacteria naturally occur in the deeper layers of skin on the hands and other areas of the body. Their numbers can be reduced by hand antisepsis, but they are never fully eradicated. Transient bacteria, however, can be removed from the surface of the skin by hand antisepsis. These bacteria are not naturally occurring and can colonise the skin on the hands following contact with patients and the environment (Boyce and Pittet, 2002). A common example of picking up transient bacteria includes contact with ‘high touch’ areas, such as telephones and computer keyboards.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.