References

Best EJ. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in a slow healing distal extremity.. Veterinary Times. 2014; 44:(14)6-8

Goldsworthy S, Mcalinden A Use of Vac in wound management.. Veterinary Times. 2011; 41:(36)18-21

Howe L. Current concepts in negative pressure wound therapy. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2015; 45:(3)565-84

KCI. V.A.C Therapy – Overview. 2016. http://kcianimalhealth.com/overview (accessed 1st August, 2016)

Li T, Zhang L, Han L Early application of negative pressure wound therapy to acute wounds contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus: An effective approach to preventing biofilm formation’. Experimental and therapeutic medicine. 2015; 11:769-76

Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, McGuirt W Vacuumassisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg. 1997; 38:553-62

Murphy PS, Evans GRD Advances in Wound Healing: A Review of Current Products. Plast Surg Int. 2012; 2012

Nolff MC, Meyer-Linderberg A. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy(NPWT) in small animal medicine: Mechanisms of action, applications and indications. Tierärztliche Praxis Kleintiere. 2016; 1:(2)26-37

Nolff MC, Fehr M, Bolling A Negative pressure wound therapy, silver coated foam dressing and conventional bandages in open wound treatment in dogs. A retrospective comparison of 50 paired cases. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 2015; 28:30-8

Perry KL, Rutherford L, Sajik DMR, Bruce M A preliminary study of the effect of closed incision management with negative pressure wound therapy over high risk incision’. BMC Veterinary Research. 2015; 11:(1)

Perry KL, Witte TH Suck it and see: Indications and action of NPWT. Veterinary Times. 2013a; 43:(27)22-4

Perry KL, Witte TH Suck it and see: Part two – Method of application and pitfalls of NPWT. Veterinary Times. 2013b; 43:(29)9-10

Putnis S, Khan WS, Wong JML Negative Pressure Wound Therapy – A Review of its Uses in Orthopaedic Trauma. The Open Orthopaedics Journal. 2014; 8:142-7

Schintler MV. Negative Pressure Therapy: Theory and Practice. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. 2012; 28:72-7

Smith S. Successful management of infected wounds using a solution and gel containing Betaine and PHMB. Wound Practice & Research. Journal of the Australian Wound Management Association. 2013; 21:(4)183-5

Stanley B. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.Birmingham, UK: Spring; 2012

Stinner DJ, Waterman SM, Masini BD, Wenke JC Silver Dressings Augment the Ability of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Reduce Bacteria in a Contaminated Open Fracture Model. Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Care. 2011; 1:(1)S147-50

Upton D, Stephens D, Andrews A Patients' experiences of negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of wounds: a review. J Wound Care. 2013; 22:(1)34-9

Negative pressure wound therapy: application, indications and is there more we could use it for?

02 October 2016
9 mins read
Volume 7 · Issue 8

Abstract

Negative pressure wound therapy (NWPT) is becoming a common tool for wound management in the veterinary practice. This method of management allows a non-invasive but crucially active and closed system to manage complex wounds by exposing the wound bed to sub-atmospheric pressure. This method is also referred to as VAC or vacuum-assisted closure. NPWT works by stimulating granulation tissue formation, reducing interstitial oedema and inflammatory cytokines, and improving circulation, all while maintaining a moist wound environment. NPWT is widely used in humans to aid healing of non-healing wounds, for example debucital ulcers, burns and open fractures. This practise has been introduced into the veterinary practice to create an ideal wound healing environment for veterinary patients.

In the author's veterinary practice negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is used in a variety of wound care cases. Publications on the technique date back 16 years, however, only minor changes have been made to the unit itself since it was first used: the unit has been made smaller; there is increased safety due to unit alarming; changes in the dressing associated and the ability for the unit to remove much more fluid (Murphy and Evans, 2012).

Large, contaminated wounds lend themselves to management with NPWT, along with dehiscing surgical wounds (Murphy and Evans, 2012); degloving injuries and skin avulsions are also indications for use along with chronic non-healing wounds. The fluid that is removed during NPWT contains high levels of proteolytic enzymes which if not removed can result in a non-healing wound environment. Less commonly compartment syndromes, for example abdominal or myofascial, are indications for NPWT management (Nolf and Meye-Lindenberg, 2016). Enterocutaneous fistulas now, despite early reservations, respond well to NPWT, and orthopaedic traumatic wounds benefit from this method as granulation tissue is evident on hardware, grafts and meshes (Murphy and Evans, 2012). Best (2014) reported the use of the unit in a slow healing distal extremity — the negative pressure applied to the wound lowers the interstitial pressure, lower than the capillary pressure, which in turn allows the capillaries to reopen and blood flow to the wound to increase.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.