References

Aziz NAA, Daly E, Allen S Distribution of Angiostrongylus vasorum and its gastropod intermediate hosts along the rural–urban gradient in two cities in the United Kingdom, using real time PCR. Parasit Vectors. 2016; 9:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1338-3

Humm K, Adamantos S. Is evaluation of a faecal smear a useful technique in the diagnosis of canine pulmonary angiostrongylosis?. J Small Anim Pract. 2010; 51:(4)200-3 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2009.00905.x

Kirk L, Limon G, Guitian FJ, Hermosilla C, Fox MT. Angiostrongylus vasorum in Great Britain: a nationwide postal questionnaire survey of veterinary practices. Vet Rec. 2014; 175:(5) https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.102196

Koch J, Willesen JL. Canine pulmonary angiostrongylosis: an update. Vet J. 2009; 179:(3)348-59 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.11.014

Lange MK, Penagos-Tabares F, Hirzmann J, Failing K, Schaper R, Van Bourgonie YR, Backeljau T, Hermosilla C, Taubert A. Prevalence of Angiostrongylus vasorum, Aelurostrongylus abstrusus and Crenosoma vulpis larvae in native slug populations in Germany. Vet Parasitol. 2018; 254:120-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.03.011

Morgan ER, Shaw SE, Brennan SF, De Waal TD, Jones BR, Mulcahy G. Angiostrongylus vasorum: a real heartbreaker. Trends Parasitol. 2005; 21:(2)49-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2004.11.006

Morgan ER, Tomlinson A, Hunter S, Nichols T, Roberts E, Fox MT, Taylor MA. Angiostrongylus vasorum and Eucoleus aerophilus in foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Great Britain. Vet Parasitol. 2008; 154:(1-2)48-57 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.02.030

Schnyder M, Stebler K, Naucke TJ, Lorentz S, Deplazes P. Evaluation of a rapid device for serological in-clinic diagnosis of canine angiostrongylosis. Parasit Vectors. 2014; 7:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-72

Taylor CS, Garcia Gato R, Learmount J Increased prevalence and geographic spread of the cardiopulmonary nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum in fox populations in Great Britain. Parasitology. 2015; 142:(9)1190-5 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182015000463

Factors driving lungworm spread and the need for ongoing diagnosis and prevention

02 April 2020
9 mins read
Volume 11 · Issue 3
Figure 1. Baermann apparatus.

Abstract

National media campaigns in the face of increased geographic distribution has put Angiostrongylus vasorum at the forefront of the minds of both veterinary professionals and dog owners alike. Familiarity with this parasite is essential, given the potential severity of disease in infected dogs and its spread to parts of the country where it has not previously been routinely diagnosed. Veterinary nurses play an important role in educating the public and giving accurate preventative advice based on local geographic and lifestyle risk. It is important therefore that nurses understand factors that drive spread and increase exposure risk in pet dogs. This article considers these factors and prevention of angiostrongylosis.

The spread of Angiostrongylus vasorum across the UK in recent years alongside drug companies having products licensed for its treatment and prevention, has led to raised awareness of this parasite among veterinary professionals and the public alike. This raised profile has been beneficial in reducing canine morbidity and mortality associated with infection, especially in parts of the country where it has not previously been endemic or routinely diagnosed. Veterinary nurses play a key role in giving accurate risk-based parasite prevention advice to clients. When advising clients on the need for angistrongylosis prevention as part of an overall parasite control programme, nurses need to consider the factors driving spread of the parasite and the resulting geographic and lifestyle factors likely to increase exposure risk.

Foxes act as a wildlife reservoir host for A. vasorum worms in the UK but any canid can be infected including domestic dogs. First stage larvae (L1) pass out in the faeces and require gastropod molluscs (slugs and snails) as intermediate hosts for further development. Infection occurs in canids when infective third stage larvae (L3) are ingested. This occurs most commonly through deliberate or accidental consumption of infected slugs or snails (Morgan et al, 2005) or paratenic hosts such as amphibians and possibly birds. Infection has also been demonstrated under experimental conditions to occur from ingestion of larvae present in slime trails (Conboy et al, 2015), but the effect of this in natural transmission is unlikely to be significant. Infected slugs have been found to contain between 1 and 54 L3 larvae, with less than 1% of these larvae leaving live slugs (Lange et al, 2018).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.