References

Abildgren L, Lebahn-Hadidi M, Mogensen CB The effectiveness of improving healthcare teams’ human factor skills using simulation-based training: a systematic review. Adv Simul. 2022; 7:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00207-2

Fioratou E, Flin R, Glavin R, Patey R Beyond monitoring: distributed situation awareness in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2010; 105:(1)83-90 https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq137

Flin R, Fletcher G, McGeorge P Anaesthetists’ attitudes to teamwork and safety. Anaesthesia. 2003; 58:(3)233-42 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.13652044.2003.03039.x

Flin R, Patey R, Glavin R, Maran N Anaesthetists’ non-technical skills. Br J Anaesth. 2010; 105:(1)38-44 https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq134

Herlehy AM Influencing safe perioperative practice through communication. AORN J. 2011; 93:(6)643-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2011.04.008

Kelly FE, Frerk C, Bailey CR Implementing human factors in anaesthesia: guidance for clinicians, departments and hospitals: guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society and the Association of Anaesthetists. Anaesthesia. 2023; 78:(4)458-78 https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15941

Larsson J, Holmstrom IK How excellent anaesthetists perform in the operating theatre: a qualitative study of non-technical skills. Surv Anesthesiol. 2013; 57:(3) https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sa.0000428899.40684.b7

Marmon LM, Heiss K Improving surgeon wellness: the second victim syndrome and quality of care. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2015; 24:(6)315-8 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2015.08.011

McMillan M Checklists in veterinary anaesthesia: why bother?. Vet Rec. 2014; 175:(22)556-9 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.g7515

McMillan MW, Lehnus KS Systems analysis of voluntary reported anaesthetic safety incidents occurring in a university teaching hospital. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2018; 45:(1)3-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2017.06.007

Oxtoby C Shifting from a blame culture to a learning culture. Companion Animal. 2018; 23:623-7 https://doi.org/10.12968/coan.2018.23.11.623

Robinson S, White W, Wilkes J, Wilkinson C Improving culture of care through maximising learning from observations and events: addressing what is at fault. Lab Anim. 2022; 56:(2)135-46 https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772211037177

Runciman W, Kluger M, Morris R Crisis management during anaesthesia: the development of an anaesthetic crisis management manual. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005; 14:(3) https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2002.004101

Sevdalis N, Hull L, Birnbach DJ Improving patient safety in the operating theatre and perioperative care: obstacles, interventions, and priorities for accelerating progress. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109:(Suppl 1)i3-16 https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes391

Stiegler MP, Tung A Cognitive processes in anesthesiology decision making. Anesthesiology. 2014; 120:(1)204-17 https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000073

Whelehan DF, Conlon KC, Ridgway PF Medicine and heuristics: cognitive biases and medical decision-making. Ir J Med Sci. 2020; 189:(4)1477-84 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02235-1

World Health Organization. Surgical safety checklist. 2009. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/44186/9789241598590_eng_Checklist.pdf

The impact of human factors on veterinary anaesthesia

02 October 2024
6 mins read
Volume 15 · Issue 8

Abstract

Human factors are an evidence-based science that consider how external factors and personal circumstances influence work behaviours and the reasons why events happen. It has been frequently studied in professions where mistakes can have disastrous consequences, such as aviation and human medicine, and is now becoming more considered in veterinary medicine. Understanding how human factors influence the safe delivery of anaesthesia means more safety measures can be put in place for both the wellbeing of patients and veterinary staff. These measures include surgical safety checklists, open communication between colleagues and the use of adverse event reporting platforms.

Human factors, or ergonomics, are an evidence-based science that considers how external factors and personal circumstances influence the reason an event happens (Abildgren et al, 2022).

Human factors have frequently been studied in professions where mistakes can have disastrous consequences, such as the aviation industry and human medicine, and is now being considered more in veterinary medicine. Understanding human factors enables further safety procedures to be put in place, reducing the risk of negative patient outcomes, while also protecting clinicians from ‘second victim syndrome’. Marmon and Heiss (2015) describe second victim syndrome as the negative impact an adverse patient event that occurs as a result of human error can have on the wellbeing of the practitioner involved.

This can manifest in the form of anxiety, guilt and a loss of confidence, ultimately leading to diminished patient and clinician welfare and an increased risk of mistakes occurring. It should be noted that incidents rarely occur because of one singular failure, but rather as a result of an accumulation of multiple compounding factors.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.