References

Böhm C, Schnyder M, Thamsborg SM Assessment of the combination of spinosad and milbemycin oxime in preventing the development of canine Angiostrongylus vasorum infections. Vet Parasitol. 2014; 199:272-7

Bolt G, Monrad J, Koch J, Jensen AL Canine angiostrongylosis: a review. Vet Rec. 1994; 135:447-52

Chapman PS, Boag AK, Guitian J, Boswood A Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in 23 dogs (1999–2002). J Small Anim Pract. 2004; 45:435-40

Conboy G Natural infections of Crenosoma vulpis and Angiostrongylus vasorum in dogs in Atlantic Canada and their treatment with milbemycin oxime. Vet Rec. 2004; 155:16-8

Conboy GA Canine angiostrongylosis: the French heartworm: an emerging threat in North America. Vet Parasitol. 2011; 6:382-9

Helm J, Gilleard JS, Jackson M, Redman E, Bell R A case of canine Angiostrongylus vasorum in Scotland confirmed by PCR and sequence analysis. J Small Anim Pract. 2009; 50:255-9

Helm JR, Morgan ER, Jackson MW, Wotton P, Bell R Canine angiostrongylosis: an emerging disease in Europe. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2010; 20:(1)98-109

Humm K, Adamantos S Is evaluation of a faecal smear a useful technique in the diagnosis of canine pulmonary angiostrongylosis?. J Small Anim Pract. 2010; 51:(4)200-3

Jefferies R, Morgan ER, Helm J, Robinson M, Shaw SE Improved detection of canine Angiostrongylus vasorum infection using real-time PCR and indirect ELISA. Parasitol Res. 2011; 109:(6)1577-83

Kistler WM, Brown JD, Allison AB, Nemeth NM, Yabsley MJ First report of Angiostrongylus vasorum and Hepatozoon from a red fox (Vulpes vulpes) from West Virginia, U.S.A. Vet Parasitol. 2014; 200:216-20

Kirk L, Limon G, Guitan FJ, Hermosilla C, Fox MT Angiostrongylus vasorum in Great Britain: a nationwide postal questionnaire survey of veterinary practices. Vet Rec. 2014; 175 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.102196

Koch J, Willesen JL Canine pulmonary angiostrongylosis: An update. Vet J. 2009; 179:348-59

Martin MWS, Ashton G, Simpson VR, Neal C Angiostrongylosis in Cornwall: Clinical presentations of eight cases. J Small Anim Pract. 1993; 34:20-5

McGarry JW, Morgan ER Identification of first-stage larvae of metastrongyles from dogs. Vet Rec. 2009; 165:258-61

Morgan ER, Shaw S Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in dogs: continuing spread and developments in diagnosis and treatment. J Small Anim Pract. 2010; 51:616-61

Morgan ER, Shaw SE, Brennan SF, De Waal TD, Jones BR, Mulcahy G Angiostrongylus vasorum: a real heartbreaker. Trends in Parasitology. 2005; 21:49-51

Morgan ER, Tomlinson A, Hunter S Angiostrongylus vasorum and Eucoleus aerophilus in foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Great Britain. Vet Parasitol. 2008; 154:48-57

Morgan ER, Jefferies R, Krajewski M, Ward P, Shaw SE Canine pulmonary angiostrongylosis: The influence of climate on parasite distribution. Parasitology International. 2009; 58:406-10

Morgan ER, Jefferies R, van Otterdijk L Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in dogs: presentation and risk factors. Vet Parasitol. 2010; 173:255-61

Philbey AW, Delgado D Detection of Angiostrongylus vasorum in red foxes in Scotland. Vet Rec. 2013; 173:(6)

Schnyder M, Fahrion A, Ossent P Larvicidal effect of imidacloprid/moxidectin spot-on solution in dogs experimentally inoculated with Angiostrongylus vasorum. Vet Parasitol. 2009; 166:326-32

Schnyder M, Maurelli MP, Morgoglione ME Comparison of faecal techniques including FLOTAC for copromicroscopic detection of first stage larvae of Angiostrongylus vasorum. Parasitol Res. 2011a; 109:(1)63-9

Schnyder M, Tanner M, Webster P, Barutzki D, Deplazes P An ELISA for sensitive and specific detection of circulating antigen of Angiostrongylus vasorum in serum samples of naturally infected dogs. Vet Parasitol. 2011b; 179:(1-3)152-8

Schnyder M, Schaper R, Bilbrough G, Morgan ER, Deplazes P Seroepidemiological survey for canine angiostrongylosis in dogs from Germany and the UK using combined detection of Angiostrongylus vasorum antigen and specific antibodies. Parasitology. 2013; 140:1442-50

Schnyder M, Stebler K, Naucke TJ, Lorentz S, Deplazes P Evaluation of a rapid device for serological in-clinic diagnosis of canine angiostrongylosis. Parasites and Vectors. 2014; 7 https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-72

Schucan A, Schnyder M, Tanner I, Barutzki D, Traversa D, Deplazes P Detection of specific antibodies in dogs infected with Angiostrongylus vasorum. Vet Parasitol. 2012; 185:(2-4)216-24

Traversa D, Guglielmini C Feline aelurostrongylosis and canine angiostrongylosis: a challenging diagnosis for two emerging verminous pneumonia infections. Vet Parasitol. 2008; 157:(3-4)163-74

Traversa D, Di Cesare A, Conboy G Canine and feline cardiopulmonary parasitic nematodes in Europe: emerging and underestimated. Parasites and Vectors. 2010; 6

Willesen JL, Kristensen AT, Jensen AL, Heine J, Koch J Efficacy and safety of imidacloprid/moxidectin spot-on solution and fenbendazole in the treatment of dogs naturally infected with Angiostrongylus vasorum (Baillet, 1866). Vet Parasitol. 2007; 147:258-64

Yamakawa Y, McGarry JW, Denk D Emerging canine angiostrongylosis in northern England: five fatal cases. Vet Rec. 2009; 164:149-52

Canine angiostrongylosis: an update

22 September 2014
9 mins read
Volume 5 · Issue 7

Abstract

The canine ‘lungworm’, Angiostrongylus vasorum, continues to grab the headlines when it comes to parasite infections of dogs in the UK. Geographical spread appears to continue apace, with fresh evidence of autocthonous infections in northern England and Scotland, leading practices to constantly re-evaluate their advice to clients on preventive worming regimens, as well as their approach to respiratory and other presentations in dogs. Recent developments offer improved information in support of practice decisions in these areas. In particular, a new point-of-care test based on detection of circulating worm antigen should help to support definitive diagnosis, so often elusive using previous tests, and to revolutionise awareness of the local level of risk. This and related serological tests are underpinning large-scale surveys to provide new epidemiological insights. The options for treatment and control of infection are also expanding, with milbemycin oxime joining moxidectin in having been shown to prevent patent infection. Surveys of clinical incidence suggest that increased awareness and improved control of the parasite can quell disease in identified ‘hotspots’. Therefore, although the threat of angiostrongylosis seems to be increasing in the UK, and extending to new areas, a growing toolkit for diagnosis and control places the veterinary professions in a strong position to counter this threat. Veterinary nurses have a particularly important role in providing laboratory support for evidence-based medicine, and for leading informed discussion of risks with dog owners. This should enable appropriate, risk-based advice on preventive worming regimens for dogs. Ongoing research suggests that other factors, such as age, breed, and individual behaviour, might also be taken into account to ensure that dogs are appropriately protected from this often mild, but potentially fatal, parasitic infection.

Care must be taken when describing Angiostrongylus vasorum infections as ‘lungworm’, since other nematode species, especially Crenosoma vulpis, are also causes of respiratory disease in dogs in the UK (McGarry and Morgan, 2009). The life cycle of A. vasorum is well established (Bolt et al, 1994). Important points to note are that first stage larvae (L1) (Figure 1) pass out in the faeces, and develop further in gastropod mollusc (slug and snail) intermediate hosts, with infection occurring when dogs ingest infective third stage larvae (L3). This is most likely to occur through intentional or accidental consumption of infected slugs or snails (Morgan et al, 2005). Infection in dogs most often causes mild to moderate respiratory disease, though a wide range of presenting signs is possible and disease can be severe and sometimes fatal (Koch and Willesen, 2009). These other signs are largely caused by bleeding disorders, the mechanism of which is unclear, and can result in neurological, gastrointestinal, ocular, dermatological or other disease depending on the site of the bleeding. Persistent bleeding after injury or surgery can occur. Other signs such as syncope, lethargy, and stunted growth are probably attributable to lung pathology. Treatment of angiostrongylosis focuses on killing the worms, and this can be achieved by administration of one of a range of anthelmintic drugs, as discussed below. Supportive treatment is recommended depending on the clinical signs (Koch and Willesen 2009; Helm et al, 2010).

Figure 1. Angiostrongylus vasorum L1 larvae.

A major challenge in clinical management of angiostrongylosis is diagnosing infection in the first place (Traversa and Guglielmini, 2008). This has traditionally been achieved by recovering and identifying L1 larvae in the faeces, using a modification of the Baermann technique. Faeces (ideally 10 g or more) are placed in a muslin pouch and submerged in water, such that the larvae actively migrate out of the faeces and sink to the bottom of the container. If a tapered container is used (e.g. an inverse conical beaker or wine glass), larvae concentrate at the bottom, and can be recovered by pipette and placed in a cavity microscope slide. Larvae are very active and in clinical cases are usually present in large numbers. After killing by adding a drop of Lugol's iodine, they can be examined under high power for specific diagnosis. L1 of A vasorum have characteristic tail morphology, with a sinusoidal kink and notch that distinguishes this species from other larvae found in dog faeces, such as Crenosoma vulpis (Figure 2) (McGarry and Morgan, 2009).

Figure 2. Crenosoma vulpis L1 larva.

The Baermann's test can be conducted easily in the practice laboratory, and although it should be left overnight for the best results, the majority of infected samples can be identified after an hour or so. The main problem with the Baermann's test is its low sensitivity, such that three consecutive faecal samples are usually recommended for diagnosis (Koch and Willesen, 2009). Other methods such as faecal flotation (Schnyder et al, 2011a) and faecal smear (Humm and Adamantos, 2010) are possible to conduct in the practice laboratory, but also suffer from limited sensitivity. Faecal samples can be sent to an external laboratory, but since comparable methods are used in those laboratories, the limitations are similar. In reality, treatment is often administered without a definitive diagnosis, and response to treatment used as a diagnostic aid. This has obvious disadvantages in the management of individual clinical cases, and also results in a lack of solid information on the extent to which the parasite is an issue in a practice catchment, which would be useful to inform future approaches to clinical cases. Local information of this sort is important because some practices in the UK experience a high level of A. vasorum challenge, while in others it is currently rare or unknown. Recent changes in epidemiology are discussed below.

The purpose of this review is not to provide comprehensive information on the parasite and the disease, since several recent reviews are available (Koch and Willesen, 2009; Morgan and Shaw, 2010; Helm et al, 2010; Traversa et al, 2010). Rather, this article aims to highlight recent changes relevant to practice in the UK. These centre on the changing range of the parasite, new diagnostic tests, and expanding treatment options.

Parasite spread: the worms go marching on

Historically, A. vasorum distribution has been characterised by a number of highly endemic areas, and low or zero prevalence outside those areas in foxes (Morgan et al, 2008), and few or no cases in dogs (Morgan et al, 2005). In the UK, such hot-spots have been established in Cornwall and in the Swansea area of south Wales for several decades, and in London and the south-east of England since the 1990s (Chapman et al, 2004). More recently, expansion appears to have occurred outside of those core areas. Elsewhere in Europe, similar expansion outside known endemic areas has been reported (Traversa et al, 2010), with new records in a series of countries. As in the UK, this is likely to be fuelled in part by increased awareness of the parasite, such that it is more likely to be recognised and reported, and also by specific studies aiming to demonstrate wide distribution. This process has undergone a step change in the past 3 years with the advent of new serological tests for detection of A. vasorum specific antigens and anti-parasite antibodies in dog serum (Schnyder et al, 2011b). In the UK, these tests have confirmed low prevalence in healthy dogs, and also a wide distribution in the southern part of the UK (Schnyder et al, 2013). This survey did not extend to the northern UK.

While apparent range expansion is certainly driven in part by increased surveillance and awareness, evidence does point to a real underlying spread. In the UK, veterinary practitioners and parasitologists have been aware of the parasite for a long time, and it can cause severe disease. It therefore seems unlikely that angiostrongylosis has always been common across the UK and was simply overlooked until recently. Cases in non-travelled dogs in northern England (Yamakawa et al, 2009) and Scotland (Helm et al, 2009) have been reported relatively recently, and the presence of the parasite in foxes (Philbey and Delgado, 2013) shows that transmission is now established in parts of the north. Very recent data show that prevalence in foxes has increased significantly in all endemic areas in the past 8 years, and that the previously negative areas of northern England and Scotland are now colonised (Morgan, unpublished data, 2014). In other countries in Europe and North America, a similar expansion appears to be occurring (Koch and Willesen, 2009; Conboy, 2011; Schnyder et al, 2013; Kistler et al, 2014), suggesting that underlying processes are in play leading to improved conditions for transmission of A. vasorum, maintenance of parasite populations in the wildlife host, and/or spill-over into the domestic dog population. These could include urbanisation of the red fox, increased dog movement, climate change, or a combination of these and other factors. Temperate climates appear to be associated with high A. vasorum prevalence in foxes (Morgan et al, 2009), and further expansion in the UK is to be expected.

Increased awareness and treatment of infection in dogs could suppress clinical disease even in areas in which the parasite is well established. A recent postal survey of practices in the UK indicates wide distribution of clinical cases, with a focus of higher reported incidence in south-east England, and another in south Wales (Kirk et al, 2014). Interestingly, no such focus was identified in south-west England, even though this is a well-established endemic area (Martin et al, 1993). Although good diagnosis, prompt treatment and appropriate worming regimens in dogs are unlikely to eradicate infection locally, given maintenance in fox reservoir hosts, it might succeed in decreasing clinical incidence in the long term.

New serological tests: implications for practice and research

The limitations of the Baermann test, in terms of sensitivity and also client compliance in collecting faecal samples, have limited its use in practice, and spurred the search for new, more sensitive and convenient tests. The blood of infected dogs carries detectable parasite-specific DNA (Jefferies et al, 2011), antigens (Schnyder et al, 2011b) and anti-parasite antibodies (Schucan et al, 2012). Detection of circulating A. vasorum antigen has formed the basis of a new, point-of-care test, AngioDetect™ (Idexx Laboratories, USA) (Schnyder et al, 2014). Reported sensitivity was 84.6% in detecting patent A. vasorum infection (Schnyder et al, 2014), and specificity 100%. The test could be used in many different ways in practice, most obviously in the diagnosis of infection in clinically affected dogs with suspicion of angiostrongylosis. In areas not known to have a high incidence of infection, it would be logical to use the test to screen cases with highly compatible clinical signs, such as coughing or dyspnoea in young dogs, or bleeding disorders. In practices with known high prevalence, these cases are likely to be recognised by clinicians with experience of the disease, and the test could be useful to confirm such cases. Testing could perhaps be even more useful in those areas to screen unusual presentations such as neurological, locomotor or gastro-intestinal disease, in which A. vasorum might be implicated but is not the primary differential. Other possible indications to test for circulating antigen include pre-anaesthetic screening, especially for young dogs, such as for neutering in endemic areas. A positive test would prompt treatment and a delay before undergoing surgery, to allow coagulation function to normalise.

Finally, routine use of the test in any of these ways should be accompanied by good recording and evaluation of results at practice level. This would enable a picture of the local level of threat to emerge. The monitoring process should be continuous as the level of threat is likely to change in many practices over the coming years. By entering AngioDetect™ test results online (www.angiodetect.co.uk), real-time mapping of positive results is also possible, with shared benefits for assessing regional risk.

New proven drugs

Fenbendazole has long been used to kill A. vasorum but must be administered daily for 7–21 days, and is not currently licensed for this purpose in the UK. Moxidectin and milbemycin oxime have also been shown to be effective (Conboy, 2004; Willesen et al, 2007) and are licensed for treatment of angiostrongylosis. Moxidectin 2.5 mg/kg spot-on (Schnyder et al, 2009) and milbemycin oxime 0.75–1.0 mg.kg orally (Böhm et al, 2014) have been shown to prevent patent angiostrongylosis by killing immature worms following experimental infection. This underpins licensed monthly use of moxidectin or milbemycin to prevent A. vasorum infection. Since label claims of different drugs are liable to change as evidence of efficacy in different circumstances is updated, it is advisable to stay aware of the current status of label claims, and not to rely for knowledge on journal articles, which can quickly become out of date on this subject.

Veterinary nurses in the vanguard

The spread of A. vasorum in the UK and other parts of Europe in recent years has fuelled increased awareness among veterinary surgeons, and the parasite is likely to be considered in the work up of a wide range of clinical presentations. As well as supporting case management, there are several areas in which veterinary nurses have a particularly valuable contribution to make at practice level. The first is in the collation of evidence from diagnostic tests, including laboratory and in-house Baermann's tests and the new AngioDetect™ test. This should be part of ongoing practice efforts to monitor the local epidemiological situation. Data so collected, in turn, should influence index of suspicion for angiostrongylosis in a wide range of clinical presentations. Furthermore, knowledge of the local epidemiological situation should influence advice given to clients on appropriate worming regimens. Even in high risk areas and individual dog profiles (e.g. young dogs in areas known to have high disease incidence), where recommendation is likely to be regular (monthly) use of a licensed preventive wormer, taking the time to discuss this with the owner is important in ensuring compliance and perceived value. This is the second area in which veterinary nurse input is key, since such conversations take time, which is often at a premium.

Developing individually tailored worming regimens for dogs is even more time consuming and requires detailed knowledge of risk factors and how they apply to each dog's profile. So far, only age has emerged as a strong and consistent risk factor for angiostrongylosis, with young dogs (< 18 months) much more likely to test positive (Koch and Willesen, 2009; Morgan et al, 2010). Results on breed predispositions are more variable, with Staffordshire Bull terriers and Cavalier King Charles spaniels identified to be at higher risk in some studies (Chapman et al, 2004) but not in others (Morgan et al, 2010). The behaviour of individual dogs is likely to influence risk of ingesting infected slugs, with activities such as scavenging, grass chewing, outdoor feeding, and off-lead exercise in areas inhabited by foxes, especially at night and in mild damp weather, all putatively increasing risk. However, data on the influence of behavioural factors on infection are few and circumstantial, and the ability to apply them to either decrease risk or guide appropriate anthelmintic intervention is questionable. What is clear is the lack of effective acquired immunity to re-infection, and the shared risk factors at household level. Any dog diagnosed positive should therefore be considered at high risk of re-infection, along with any house or kennel mates.

Conclusions

A. vasorum has spread in the UK in recent years, and given abundant fox populations and widespread dog movement, and climate change, it will probably continue to spread. However, better tools than ever are now available for diagnosing, treating and preventing infection. These should help not only to manage individual cases, but also to recommend effective and appropriate preventive worming regimens for dogs. Nurses have an important role to play in building information of local risk and communicating this to practice clients in support of evidence-based control.

Key Points

  • Angiostrongylus vasorum is spreading in the UK and cases can be expected in areas in which the parasite has not historically been considered a threat.
  • A new antigen-detection test (AngioDetect™) is now available and should be used to support clinical diagnosis and assessment of local risk.
  • Risk-based approaches to preventive worming should be used, and based on the local epidemiological situation and perhaps individual dog profiles.
  • Nurses have important roles in diagnosis, collating data, and advising dog owners of the risks and how to avoid or control them.
  • The distribution of the parasite is changing all the time and constant local monitoring, and updating knowledge of latest developments, is advised.