References

Adachi H, Toda N, Hayashi S Mechanism of the excitatory action of motilin on isolated rabbit intestine. Gastroenterology. 1981; 80:(4)783-788 https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(81)90141-4

Ade M. External morphology and evolution of the rhinarium of lagomorpha. With special reference to the Glires hypothesis. Mitt Mus Naturkunde Berlin. Zoosyst Evol. 1999; 75:(2)191-216 https://doi.org/10.1002/mmnz.19990750203

Allaby M. Oxford dictionary of zoology.Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009

Asher M, de Oliveira ES, Sachser N. Social system and spatial organization of wild guinea pigs (Cavia aperea) in a natural population. J Mammal. 2004; 85:(4)788-796 https://doi.org/10.1644/BNS-012

Bagóné Vántus VB, Kovacs M, Zsolnai A. The rabbit caecal microbiota: development, composition and its role in the prevention of digestive diseases – a review on recent literature in the light of molecular genetic methods. Acta Agrar Kvár. 2014; 18:(1)55-65

Blas E, Gidenne T. Digestion of starch and sugars, 2nd edn. In: de Blas C, Wiseman J (eds). Wallingford: CABI Publishing; 2010

Cámara VM, Prieur DJ. Secretion of colonic isozyme of lysozyme in association with cecotrophy of rabbits. Am J Physiol. 1984; 247:(1 Pt 1)G19-G23

Capello V, Gracis M, Lennox A. Rabbit and rodent dentistry handbook.Lake Worth: Zoological Education Network; 2005

Carpenter JW. Lagomorpha (pikas, rabbits, and hares), 5th edn. In: Fowler ME, Miller RE (eds). Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002

Carpenter JW, Wolf KN, Kolmstetter C. Feeding small pet mammals, 5th edn. In: Hand MS, Thatcher CD, Remillard RL, Roudebush P, Novotny BJ (eds). Topeka: Mark Morris Institute; 2012

Cheeke PR. Digestive physiology.Orlando: Academic Press; 1987

Combes S, Fortun-Lamothe L, Cauquil L, Gidenne T. Engineering the rabbit digestive ecosystem to improve digestive health and efficacy. Animal. 2013; 7:(9)1429-39 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113001079

Crowley EJ, King JM, Wilkinson T, Worgan HJ, Huson KM, Rose MT, McEwan NR. Comparison of the microbial population in rabbits and guinea pigs by next generation sequencing. PLoS One. 2017; 12:(2) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165779

Davies RR, Rees Davies JAE. Rabbit gastrointestinal physiology. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 2003; 6:(1)139-153 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1094-9194(02)00024-5

de Blas E, Gidenne T. Digestion of starch and sugars. In: de Blas E, Wiseman J (eds). Wallingford: CABI Publishing; 1998

Donnelly TM, Vella D. Basic anatomy, physiology, and husbandry of rabbits, 4th edn. In: Quesenbery K, Orcutt CJ, Mans C, Carpenter JW (eds). New York: Elsevier, Inc; 2021

Dudley ES, Boivin GP. Gastric volvulus in guinea pigs: comparison with other species. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2011; 50:(4)526-530

Ebino KY. Studies on coprophagy in experimental animals. Exp Anim. 1993; 42:(1)1-9 https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim1978.42.1_1

Fann MK, O'Rourke D. Normal bacterial flora of the rabbit gastrointestinal tract: A clinical approach. Seminars in Avian and Exotic Pet Medicine. 2001; 10:(1)45-47 https://doi.org/10.1053/saep.2001.19794

Fawcett A. Management of husbandry-related problems in guinea pigs. In Pract. 2011; 33:(4)163-171 https://doi.org/10.1136/inp.d1812

Fekete S. Recent findings and future perspectives of digestive physiology in rabbits: a review. Acta Vet Hung. 1989; 37:(3)265-279

Franz R, Kreuzer M, Hummel J, Hatt JM, Clauss M. Intake, selection, digesta retention, digestion and gut fill of two coprophageous species, rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus), on a hay-only diet. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2011; 95:(5)564-570 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01084.x

Fraser M, Girling S. Rabbit medicine and surgery for veterinary nurses.Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2009

Freeman L, Becvarova I, Cave N World Small Animal Veterinary Association Nutritional Assessment Guidelines. J Small Anim Pract. 2011; 52:385-396 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01079.x

Adaptations in herbivore nutrition. 2010. http://lafeber.com/vet/adaptations-in-herbivore-nutrition/ (accessed 13 February 2020)

Grant TD, Specian RD. Proliferation of goblet cells and vacuolated cells in the rabbit distal colon. Anat Rec. 1998; 252:(1)41-48 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199809)252:1<41::AID-AR5>3.0.CO;2-H

Gribovskaja-Rupp I, Babygirija R, Takahashi T, Ludwig K. Autonomic nerve regulation of colonic peristalsis in Guinea pigs. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014; 20:(2)185-196 https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm.2014.20.2.185

Gutiérrez JR, Bozinovic F. Diet selection in captivity by a generalist herbivorous rodent (Octodon degus) from the Chilean coastal desert. J Arid Environ. 1998; 39:(4)601-607 https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.1998.0412

Hagen KB, Dittmann MT, Ortmann S, Kreuzer M, Hatt JM, Clauss M. Retention of solute and particle markers in the digestive tract of chinchillas (Chinchilla laniger). J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2016; 100:(5)801-806 https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12441

Harkness JE, Turner PV, VandeWoude S, Wheeler CL. Harkness and Wagner's biology and medicine of rabbits and rodents, 5th edn. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2013

Hartmann K. Husbandry-related diseases in the chinchilla. Tierarztl Prax. 1993; 21:(6)574-580

Holtenius K, Björnhag G. The colonic separation mechanism in the guinea-pig (Cavia porcellus) and the chinchilla (Chinchilla laniger). Comp Biochem Physiol Part A Physiol. 1985; 82:(3)537-542 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(85)90429-3

Ito Z. Motilide as motilin receptor agonist: a new class of prokinetic agents originating from the macrolides. Regulatory Peptide Letters. 1990; 2:12-15

Janis CM, Fortelius M. On the means whereby mammals achieve increased functional durability of their dentitions, with special reference to limiting factors. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1988; 63:(2)197-230 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1988.tb00630.x

Jekl V, Hauptman K, Knotek Z. Diseases in pet degus: a retrospective study in 300 animals. J Small Anim Pract. 2011; 52:(2)107-112 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2010.01028.x

Jernvall J, Thesleff I. Tooth shape formation and tooth renewal: evolving with the same signals. Development. 2012; 139:(19)3487-3497 https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.085084

How Many Pet Rabbits Are There in the US? Statistics to Know in 2022. 2022. https://petkeen.com/pet-rabbits-in-us-statistics/#:~:text=The%20rabbit%20is%20the%20third,pet%20rabbits%20in%20the%20US (accessed 16 May 2022)

Gastrointestinal problems in rabbits. 2010. http://lafeber.com/vet/gastrointestinal-problems-in-rabbits/ (accessed 14 February 2020)

Kenagy GJ, Veloso C, Bozinovic F. Daily rhythms of food intake and feces reingestion in the degu, an herbivorous Chilean rodent: optimizing digestion through coprophagy. Physiol Biochem Zool. 1999; 72:(1)78-86 https://doi.org/10.1086/316644

Laska M. Gustatory responsiveness to food-associated saccharides in European rabbits, Oryctolagus cuniculus. Physiol Behav. 2002; 76:(2)335-341 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00719-9

Lelkes L, Chang CL. Microbial dysbiosis in rabbit mucoid enteropathy. Lab Anim Sci. 1987; 37:(6)757-764

Merck veterinary manual: bacterial and mycotic diseases of rabbits. 2020. http://www.merckvetmanual.com/exotic-and-laboratory-animals/rabbits/bacterial-and-mycotic-diseases-of-rabbits (accessed 26 March 2021)

Merck veterinary manual: nutrition of rabbits. 2021. http://www.merckvetmanual.com/exotic-and-laboratory-animals/rabbits/nutrition-of-rabbits (accessed 19 September 2021)

Merchant HA, McConnell EL, Liu F Assessment of gastrointestinal pH, fluid and lymphoid tissue in the guinea pig, rabbit and pig, and implications for their use in drug development. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2011; 42:(1-2)3-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2010.09.019

O'Malley B. Clinical anatomy and physiology of exotic species: structure and function of mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians.London: Elsevier Saunders; 2005

O'Neill DG, Craven HC, Brodbelt DC, Church DB, Hedley J Morbidity and mortality of domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) under primary veterinary care in England. Vet Rec. 2019; 186:(14)451-451 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105592

Oglesbee BL. Blackwell's Five-minute veterinary consult: small mammal.Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2010

Owen DG. Laboratory animals handbook No. 12-parasites of laboratory animals.London: Royal Society of Medicine Services Ltd; 1992

Pairet M, Bouyssou T, Ruckebusch Y. Colonic formation of soft feces in rabbits: a role for endogenous prostaglandins. Am J Physiol. 1986; 250:(3 Pt 1)G302-G308

Prebble J. Chinchilla husbandry: an overview of correct care. The Veterinary Nurse. 2011; 2:(8)452-458 https://doi.org/10.12968/vetn.2011.2.8.452

Quesenberry KE, Donnelly TM, Mans C. Biology, husbandry, and clinical techniques of guinea pigs and chinchillas, 3rd edn. In: Quesenberry KE, Carpenter JW (eds). St. Louis: WB Saunders; 2012

Ruckebusch Y, Fioramonti J. Thefusus coli of the rabbit as a pacemaker area. Experientia. 1976; 32:(8)1023-1024 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01933949

Rabbit Welfare Association & Fund (RWAF). Think you want a rabbit?. 2022. http://rabbitwelfare.co.uk/rabbit-care-advice/ownership/think-you-want-a-rabbit/ (accessed 16 May 2022)

Sirotek K, Marounek M, Rada V, Benda V. Isolation and characterization of rabbit caecal pectinolytic bacteria. Folia Microbiol. 2001; 46:(1)79-82 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02825893

Ungar PS. Mammalian dental function and wear: A review. Biosurface and Biotribology. 2015; 1:(1)25-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsbt.2014.12.001

Varga M. Textbook of rabbit medicine.Edinburgh: Butterworth Heineman Elsevier; 2014

Wolf P, Schröder A, Wenger A, Kamphues J. The nutrition of the chinchilla as a companion animal - basic data, influences and dependences. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2003; 87:(3-4)129-133 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0396.2003.00425.x

Small mammal herbivores part 1: digestive system adaptations to a herbivorous diet

02 September 2022
10 mins read
Volume 13 · Issue 7
Figure 1. Rabbits and other companion herbivores have specific nutritional needs that are informed by their digestive physiology. Providing appropriate diets in the veterinary hospital, as well as counseling pet owners on what to provide at home, are important skills for the veterinary nurse to master.

Abstract

Nutritional disease is common in exotic companion mammals, and the unique dietary adaptations of herbivorous species only compounds this issue. The target species (including lagomorphs, and hystricomorph or caviomorph rodents) exhibit anatomical and physiological adaptations to a plant-based diet that is low in calories and protein, and high in fibre. Digestive tract adaptations such as hypselodont dentition to hindgut fermentation will be reviewed. Veterinary nurses are in an excellent position to counsel pet owners on the appropriate nutrition of their companion animals, and understanding these unique adaptations provides the necessary baseline knowledge to make recommendations.

Nutrition has been recognised as the fifth vital assessment, following temperature, pulse, respiration, and pain, by the World Small Animal Veterinary Association (Freeman et al, 2011). While this campaign has focused on raising awareness of the importance of nutrition for canine and feline patients, it helps bring to mind this aspect of care for any species that is brought into the veterinary practice. Exotics practitioners are no stranger to nutritional needs and disease in exotic companion animals: husbandry-related diseases are disturbingly common in exotic pets. Estimates of the prevalence of husbandry-related diseases range depending on the study, but it is generally agreed that inadequate husbandry is a leading cause of illness in captive exotic animal species (Hartmann, 1993; Fawcett, 2011; Jekl et al, 2011; Prebble, 2011; O'Neill et al, 2020). Client education of appropriate husbandry practices is critical for prevention of husbandry-related disease as well as treatment, however the veterinary staff must be well versed in the needs of these animals in order to provide appropriate information.

Herbivores have many unique adaptations that allow them to survive on a diet with a relatively low calorie density, that is higher in fibre and lower in protein compared with the diet of carnivores and omnivores (Grant, 2010) (Figure 1). These adaptations will be explored to better understand the nutritional needs of exotic companion herbivores.

Figure 1. Rabbits and other companion herbivores have specific nutritional needs that are informed by their digestive physiology. Providing appropriate diets in the veterinary hospital, as well as counseling pet owners on what to provide at home, are important skills for the veterinary nurse to master.

Summary of target species

The selected species considered in this article are monogastric hindgut fermenters: they have a single, non-compartmentalised stomach, and a large caecum that is the site of microbial fermentation (Carpenter et al, 2012). The following taxa represent some of the most common exotic mammals presented to the veterinary practice as companion animals, and include:

  • Order Lagomorpha, family Leporidae (rabbits and hares): the domestic rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) is one of the most common small exotic mammal pets in both the UK (Rabbit Welfare Association & Fund, 2022) and USA (Jones, 2022).
  • Order Rodentia, suborder Hystricomorpha, infraorder Caviomorpha. Some texts refer to ‘hystricomorph’ rodents, although this parent clade includes many extinct as well as extant taxa. The infraorder Caviomorpha (the ‘new world hystricomorphs’) includes:
  • Caviidae (guinea pigs, cavies, maras, capybara) — guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) are a common representative of this family as a companion mammal
  • Octodontidae (degus, rock rats, and relatives) — the common degu (Octodon degus) is perhaps not as common as the other pet species discussed but is nevertheless well represented in the pet trade
  • Chinchillidae (chinchillas, viscachas) — the domestic chinchilla, thought to be descended from the long-tailed chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera), is a common companion mammal.

Digestive physiology is best described in rabbits, so most of this discussion will be lagomorph-centric. Where the mode of digestion is the same in the species to be discussed, we will extrapolate the general mechanics of how the rabbit digestive system functions to other species. Unique adaptations, anatomy, and dietary requirements of the other featured species will be highlighted.

Gastrointestinal tract adaptations to herbivory

Senses and food selection

The target species have wide visual fields to facilitate environmental surveillance of threats while foraging, as the low calorie density of the natural diet necessitates the in-take of large volumes of plant material (Carpenter, 2002; Varga, 2014). Rabbits and guinea pigs will use their sensitive lips and vibrissae as well as olfactory cues to distinguish food items, and use their prehensile lips to grasp food. Chinchillas and degus will grasp food with their forelimbs. Rabbits are described as selective feeders and wild rabbits prefer eating tender plants to coarse grasses and sedges (Cheeke, 1987). Selective feeding is also observed in chinchillas where highly palatable food items (e.g. high in simple carbohydrates and fats) are preferred to foods lower in carbohydrates/fats (Wolf et al, 2003). Degus also demonstrate selective feeding behaviour, preferring vegetation that is lower in fibre and higher in protein and moisture (Guitierrez and Bozinovic, 1998). Wild guinea pigs are described as unspecialised grazers (Asher et al, 2004), however in captivity there is vast anecdotal observation that they will preferentially eat concentrates (Carpenter et al, 2012; Quesenberry et al, 2012) (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Guinea pigs, like the other described target species, are selective feeders and will preferentially eat specific palatable foods over a balanced diet.

Rabbits demonstrate a taste preference for glucose and maltose (Laska, 2002). Hunger has several stimuli, including a dry mouth, empty stomach, or decreased blood levels of glucose, amino acids, lactic acid, or volatile fatty acids (Fekete, 1989).

The oral cavity

The vertebrate digestive tract naturally starts at the mouth. Rabbits are known to have a blind spot immediately in front of the mouth (as a result of their wide, lateral field of vision to improve predator detection) and rely on olfaction and sensitive vibrissae to identify food (O'Malley 2005; Harkness et al, 2013; Donnelly and Vella, 2021). Rabbits and guinea pigs have prehensile lips to apprehend food; chinchillas and degus use their forelimbs to apprehend food. These animals feed frequently: rabbits have been described as feeding up to 30 times per day over 4–6 minute intervals (O'Malley, 2005).

The teeth are adapted to a diet that is very abrasive, causing a lot of ‘wear and tear’ to the enamel. Rabbits chew approximately 120 times per minute (Harkness et al, 2013). There are several terms to describe the dentition of these herbivores:

  • Hypsodont — the teeth have crowns that extend high past the gingival margin, with short roots (Allaby, 2009)
  • Aradicular — the teeth are open-rooted (Harkness et al, 2013).
  • Elodont — the teeth grow continuously through the animal's life, to offset enamel wear through their lifetime (Harkness et al, 2013).

The term hypselodont has been used as an all-inclusive term to describe teeth with high crowns, short and open roots, that grow continuously (Janis and Fortelius, 1988) as a result of a germinative bud at the apex containing dental stem cells (Jernvall and Thesleff, 2012; Ungar, 2015).

The incisors are long and used to ‘snip’ plant material, canines are absent, and they possess premolars and molars (that are anatomically indistinct) for grinding food. There is a large gap between the incisors and premolars (the diastema). The tooth is divided into the clinical crown and reserve crown, above and below the gingival margin, respectively (Capello et al, 2005).

Dental formulae of these species can be found in Table 1. Note that rodents are monophyodont and rabbits (Lagomorpha) are diphyodont (Capello et al, 2005).


Table 1. Dental formulae of the featured species
Species Incisors Canines Premolars Molars Total teeth
Chinchilla, Chinchilla lanigera 1/1 0/0 1/1 3/3 20
Degu, Octodon degus 1/1 0/0 1/1 3/3 20
Guinea pig, Cavia porcellus 1/1 0/0 1/1 3/3 20
Rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus, permanent teeth 2/1 0/0 3/2 3/3 28
Rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus, deciduous teeth 2/1 0/0 3/2 0/0 16
(Capello et al, 2005)

The opening of the mouth in these species is very small, and the lips fold into the oral cavity behind the incisor at the diastema (the inflexa pellita) (Ade, 1999). In rabbits, saliva is continuously secreted by the mandibular salivary gland. All salivary glands (parotid, mandibular, sublingual, zygomatic) produce additional saliva in response to food intake (Davies and Davies, 2003). Rabbit saliva contains amylase that initiates chemical digestion of carbohydrates (Fekete, 1989).

Oesophagus and stomach

The stomach of these animals always contains ingesta (Davies and Davies, 2003), that should have a soft, pliable consistency when palpated. Stomachs that are bloated and turgid, or the contents feel firm and not pliable, are abnormal (Fraser and Girling, 2009; Donnelly and Vella, 2021). Hindgut fermenters have a very tight oesophageal (cardiac) sphincter and cannot vomit or eructate (Davies and Davies, 2003; Donnelly and Vella, 2021). Compared with other non-herbivorous species, they produce a relatively large volume of saliva and stomach fluids that mix with ingesta. These two factors lead to a rapid development of gastric dilatation (of fluids or gas) in the event of digestive hypomotility or obstruction (Kelleher, 2010; Oglesbee, 2010). Guinea pigs are especially predisposed to developing gastric dilatation volvulus (Dudley and Boivin, 2011), although the reason for this is unclear.

Gastric glands produce pepsin and hydrochloric acid. The gastric pH is very acidic: rabbits are reported at <2.0 (Carpenter et al, 2012) and as low as 1.6 (Hamid et al, 2011); Guinea pigs are reported to have a gastric pH of 2.9-4.4 (Merchant et al, 2011). This pH is thought to sterilise ingesta before it reaches the small intestine. When caecotrophs are ingested, the pH rises to 3. Neonatal rabbits' gastric pH is higher at 5–6.5, permitting bacteria to pass through the stomach and small intestine to colonise the caecum (Blas and Gidenne, 2010). Gastric transit time in rabbits is 3–6 hours (Varga, 2014).

Small and large intestines

The small intestines are composed of (cranially to caudally) the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum as in other vertebrate species, and their functions are similar: bile, digestive enzymes, and buffers are secreted here. The duodenum is a site of further digestion of chyme that exits the stomach via the pyloric sphincter. The bile duct empties into the proximal duodenum, and a pancreatic duct opens into the duodenum at the junction of the transverse and ascending loops (Varga, 2014). Motilin is a polypeptide hormone produced by enterochromaffin cells in the duodenum and jejunum, and regulates motility by stimulating smooth muscle contractions of the stomach, small intestine, colon, and rectum in rabbits. Motilin production is stimulated by the presence of fat in the digestive tract, and inhibited by carbohydrates (Adachi et al, 1981; Ito, 1990; Varga, 2014). Lagomorphs possess the sacculus rotundus (or ileocaecal tonsil), a thin-walled, honeycomb-like structure containing lymphatic tissue located at the terminal ileum (Carpenter et al, 2012).

Digesta that moves through the ileocaecocolic junction into the proximal colon is then sorted via a colonic separation mechanism: peristaltic action moves large fibre particles, lignin, and hair further into the colon to become hard faeces, and an antiperistaltic action moves soluble fibres, fluid, and bacteria into the caecum (Quesenbery et al, 2012; Harkness et al, 2013). Lagomorphs utilise a stream of water as a colonic separation mechanism to transport the digesta and bacteria from the proximal colon into the caecum. In contrast, guinea pigs and chinchillas employ a ‘mucus trap’ to recuperate caecal bacteria from the colon (Holtenius and Bjornhag, 1985; Hagen et al, 2016). This is considered less efficient at recapturing bacteria than the lagomorph's mechanism (Franz et al, 2011). The mucus is guided along a colonic furrow in the ascending colon to the caecum (Holtenius and Bjornhag, 1985; Hagen et al, 2016). Hard faeces will pass through the colon, and water reabsorption occurs here as in other vertebrates (Davies and Davies 2003).

The caecum, and caecotroph production

The caecum is the site of hindgut fermentation. Caecal flora possess enzymes (various hydrolases) that break down plant fibres and cell walls via hydrolysis. The resulting monosaccharides and amino acids are used by these flora for energy (Combes et al, 2013). Caecotrophs (sometimes spelled caecotropes, and also referred to as ‘soft faeces’ or ‘night faeces’) are the specialised product of caecal microbial fermentation. Caecotrophs contain sequestered products of microbial fermentation, including volatile fatty acids (VFAs), amino acids, B vitamins, vitamin C, and vitamin K (Varga, 2014; Mayer, 2021). VFAs are absorbed actively through the walls of the caecum and colon and are used for energy (Davies and Davies, 2003).

Caecotrophs in rabbits are produced about 4–8 hours after eating (Varga, 2014), and are expelled typically at night and early morning (Davies and Davies, 2003). Guinea pigs are described as eating food and their caecotrophs throughout the day (Ebino, 1993). In contrast, chinchillas have been described as ingesting more than 70% of their daily feed intake at night (Wolf et al, 2003) and typically produce and ingest caecotrophs at night (Quesenberry et al, 2012) (Figure 3). Degus also predominantly produce and ingest caecotrophs overnight (Kenagy et al, 1999) (Figure 4).

Figure 3. Chinchillas will predominantly eat, as well as produce and ingest caecotrophs, at night. It is not unusual to observe scant food intake during the day.
Figure 4. Like chinchillas, degus also produce and ingest caecotrophs predominantly at night.

Caecotrophs passing through the colon are coated in mucus, produced by goblet cells, that will protect the contents from the acidic environment of the stomach when ingested (Grant and Specian, 1998). The mucus also contains lysozyme that continues breaking down bacteria, even after expulsion from the digestive tract (Camara and Prieur, 1984). The continued lysis of microbial proteins facilitates nutrient absortion while caecotrophs pass through the small intestines (Fekete, 1989). The lagomorph colon has a unique structure called the fusus coli, located at the caudal transverse colon. This muscular, thickened region acts as a sort of ‘gut pacemaker’ and the peristaltic pattern will differ between hard faeces and caecotroph production. It initiates peristalsis throughout the colon, as well as controls separation of fermentable and indigestible digesta as described above (Ruckesbusch and Fioramonti, 1976). The fusus coli is influenced by multiple regulatory mechanisms: circulating prostaglandins, aldosterone and autonomic nervous system are all implicated (Pairet et al, 1986). In guinea pigs, there is experimental data demonstrating that colonic peristalsis appears to be controlled by the autonomic nervous system (Gribovskaja-Rupp et al, 2014).

Caecotrophs are ingested either directly from the anus or from the environment, and the rabbit's masticatory pattern differs to prevent disruption of the mucoid coating (Cheeke, 1987). Although the term ‘coprophagy’ is some-times used in the literature to describe the behaviour of ingesting caecotrophs, it is perhaps important to distinguish this behaviour as caecotrophy and not coprophagy. Coprophagy implies that a waste product is being ingested, and caecotrophs are not waste (Davies and Davies, 2003) but a nutrient-dense product of specific anatomical and behavioural adaptations that is necessary for survival of these species. Ingested caecotrophs will remain in the gastric fundus for 6–8 hours, where further fermentation occurs inside each caecotroph (Varga, 2014).

Identification of normal caecal flora has traditionally been achieved using culture techniques. Modern advances in molecular biology have allowed for a better understanding of the caecal microbiota. It has been estimated that only 24–40% of rabbit caecal flora has been identified using traditional culture techniques (Bagóné Vántus et al, 2014). See Table 2 for a summary of microbes that have been identified as normal flora in the rabbit caecum. Coliform bacteria such as Escherichia coli can proliferate when there is diarrhoea (Mayer, 2020). Rabbits are known to experience bacterial overgrowth (such as E. coli and Clostridium spp.) when fed a low fibre (<12% dry matter basis) and/or highenergy diet (Kelleher, 2010).


Table 2. Summary of gut flora identified in rabbits
Species identified Reference
Traditional culture techniques
Bacteroides spp. predominant Fann and O'Rourke, 2001; Sirotek et al, 2001
Bacteroides spp. predominant (Bacteriodetes); Bifidobacterium spp. (Actinobacteria), Endophorus spp., Streptococcus spp. (Firmicutes), Acuformis spp., Clostridium spp., Peptococcus spp., Peptostreptococcus spp., Fusobacterium spp. Cheeke, 1987, de Blas and Gidenne 1998
Fecal analysis techniques
Flagellated protozoa (Eutrichomastix spp., Enteromonas spp., Retortamonas spp.), amoeboid protozoa (Entamoeba cuniculi) Lelkes and Chang, 1987; Owen, 1992
Molecular biology techniques
Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Fibrobacteres, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Tenericutes, and unclassified microbes Crowley et al, 2017

Conclusion

The digestive tract of monogastric hindgut fermenters is uniquely adapted to optimise the nutrition obtained from an abrasive diet with a low nutrient density. Understanding the intricacies of this digestive mode is essential when considering nutritional counselling for these species as veterinary patients, as well as when investigating digestive tract dysfunction.

The following review article will explore wellness nutrition for these target species.

KEY POINTS

  • Husbandry-related diseases, including nutritional disease, are a common cause of illness in exotic companion animals.
  • Companion mammal herbivores are predominantly monogastric hindgut fermenters, whose digestive systems are optimised to obtain nutrition from a low calorie, high fibre diet.
  • Hindgut fermenters produce caecotrophs in the caecum, which are a source of essential nutrients that may otherwise not be obtained in the natural diet.