Unilateral anal sacculectomy for anal sac apocrine gland adenocarcinoma with urethral involvement

Hayleigh Robbins
Saturday, October 2, 2021

The patient presented to a veterinary hospital with a month-long history of ‘scooting’ and a right-sided anal gland mass. A diagnosis of a stage 2 anal sac apocrine gland adenocarcinoma was confirmed, and the patient underwent a right-sided anal sacculectomy. There was involvement of the urethra and adherence to the rectum and a subsequent urethral incision was necessary, which was surgically repaired at the time of surgery. The patient was hospitalised for several weeks postoperatively for urinary catheter care and further nursing interventions. The patient was discharged from hospital 3 weeks after surgery once the urethra had healed sufficiently enough to enable normal micturition and subsequently made a full recovery.

Table 1. Clinical staging system for anal sac aprocrine gland adenocarcinoma
Table 1. Clinical staging system for anal sac aprocrine gland adenocarcinoma

The patient was referred to the oncology department of a veterinary hospital with a history of faecal tenesmus and a palpable right-sided anal gland mass, confirmed as a stage 2 anal sac apocrine gland carcinoma after fine needle aspirates and abdominal ultrasonography at the referring veterinary surgery (RVS).

Signalment

Species: Canine

Breed: Crossbreed

Age: 7 years 10 months

Sex: Male neutered

Weight: 19.8 kg

Canine anal sac gland carcinomas

Canine anal sac gland carcinomas (also known as anal sac adenocarcinomas or apocrine gland carcinomas of the anal sacs) arise from the apocrine glands situated within the walls of the anal sacs, which secrete fluid into the glands themselves (Polton and Brearley, 2007). This type of tumour is thought to be relatively uncommon, however, correct and rapid diagnosis is vital because of its nature, as they are often invasive with a high rate of metastasis to regional lymph nodes. Approximately 36–96% of cases show metastasis to the lymph nodes at the time of presentation, with 50% of those cases showing metastases to the regional iliac and/or sub-lumbar lymph nodes (Bray, 2016). These tumours, which are usually unilateral, can present with a variety of clinical signs, including perianal swelling, faecal tenesmus or licking of the perianal area, but it is thought that up to 40% are detected incidentally during a routine examination (Bray, 2016). Clinical signs can also be attributed to increased ionised calcium levels as a result of paraneoplastic hypercalcaemia, and these cases may present with polyuria, polydipsia, weakness, weight loss or lethargy (Bray, 2016). Interestingly, there seems to be a higher prevalence of this type of tumour in specific breeds, with Polton and Brearley (2007) describing a particular disposition in English Cocker Spaniels. It is also reported that Labrador Retrievers, German Shepherds and English Springer Spaniels are at higher risk (Bray, 2016). Larger studies have shown no gender bias, but it was originally thought to affect largely older, female dogs; this now has been disproved (Bray, 2016).

Staging and diagnosis

Staging of these tumours prior to commencing treatment is crucial to guide prognosis and treatment and to influence owner decisions regarding treatment options. Tumours can be classified into clinical stages 1–4, which are dependent on a number of factors that will then influence treatment plans recommended for these patients (Table 1). Staging should be determined by a thorough rectal examination to determine size and extent of infiltration into surrounding tissue, and ideally an abdominal ultrasound to check for metastases to abdominal organs and for evidence of lymphadenopathy. Abdominal radiography may also be performed if ultrasound is not available, but this is thought to be less effective at determining the size of lymph nodes when compared with ultrasonography (Bray, 2016).


Table 1. Clinical staging system for anal sac aprocrine gland adenocarcinoma
Table 1. Clinical staging system for anal sac aprocrine gland adenocarcinoma
Clinical Stage T - Tumour N - Node M - Metastasis Median survival time (MST)
Stage 1 <2.5 cm maximum diameter None None >1205 days
Stage 2 >2.5 cm maximum diameter None None >722 days
Stage 3a Any size T Present (<4.6cm max diameter) None >448–492 days
Stage 3b Any size T Present (>4.5cm max diameter) None 294–335 days
Stage 4 Any size T Any N None 71–82 days

Polton and Brearley, 2007

Assessment and investigations

A left sided anal sacculectomy (as a result of a ruptured anal sac abscess) was performed at the RVS a year before the patient presented with the current condition. Otherwise, previous clinical history was unremarkable. The patient was sedated for fine needle aspirates of the right anal gland, which confirmed an anal sac apocrine gland adenocarcinoma. The patient was then readmitted to the RVS for staging. A full rectal examination confirmed the presence of a 3 cm-by-3 cm mass originating from the right anal gland, extending ventrally by 4 cm, with no palpable lymph nodes. An abdominal ultrasound scan demonstrated a normal abdomen with no evidence of metastasis to the lymph nodes or abdominal organs. The patient underwent thoracic radiographs, which showed no evidence of thoracic metastases. This confirmed the diagnosis of a stage 2 anal sac apocrine gland adenocarcinoma (primary tumour greater than 2.5 cm in diameter with no evidence of regional or distant metastatic disease). The patient was then referred to a veterinary hospital for specialist surgical intervention.

Following a consultation with the oncology and surgical departments, a decision was made to admit the patient for a right-sided anal sacculectomy to remove the primary tumour. Axilla temperature, heart and respiratory rate were within normal limits on admission and thoracic and cardiac auscultation was normal. The patient was anxious, but friendly, bright, alert and responsive, with a body condition score of 5 out of 9. An intravenous catheter was placed aseptically into the left saphenous vein by the registered veterinary nurse (RVN). A routine pre-operative blood sample was taken from the catheter hub to run a complete blood count, biochemistry and electrolyte analysis. Ionised calcium levels were of particular interest in this case, and they were within normal limits at 1.34 mmol/litre (reference range 1.0–1.45 mmol/litre). Haematology and electrolytes were also within normal limits. Alkaline phosphatase (ALKP) and alanine transaminase (ALT) were elevated, with the ALKP reading as 122 U/litre (0.0–25.0) and ALT as 97 U/L (0.0–25.0). This was not thought to be clinically relevant to this patient.

Surgery

The patient was premedicated intravenously with 0.2 mg/kg methadone (Synthadon, Animalcare) and 2 μg/kg of medetomidine (Sedastart, Animalcare), and induced with propofol (Propoflo Plus, Abbott). A buprenorphine (Vetergesic, Ceva Animal Health) and bupivacaine (Marcain, AstraZeneca) lumbosacral epidural was performed by the anaesthetist to good effect. Surgical management was difficult, which was expected because of the diffuse size of the tumour, with adherence to the rectum and urethra. Careful dissection was performed. A urinary catheter was placed to facilitate postoperative bladder management, as an incision into the urethra was necessary in order to completely excise the tumour as seen in Figure 1. The general anaesthetic was monitored by the RVN without consequence, and the patient's recovery was smooth.


Figure 1. Intra-operative appearance of extensive adherence of the tumour to the surrounding structures. The urinary catheter is visible via the urethral incision.

Postoperative nursing care

Nursing care of this patient was of vital importance and encompassed a variety of clinical interventions in order to provide the best holistic care for this case, and while intensive, was rewarding. Pain assessment and provision of analgesia throughout hospitalisation was paramount. If a patient does not receive appropriate analgesia there can be a number of negative effects, including, but not limited to, a decreased appetite and immune function, an increased heart rate and blood pressure, as well as more serious physiological problems such as hyperglycaemia as a result of insulin resistance and release of inflammatory cytokines, which are involved in inflammation and nerve injury (Mathews et al, 2014). Pain scoring was performed every 2 hours using the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale (Reid, 2007) In the peri-operative period methadone (Synthadon, Animalcare) 0.2 mg/kg was administered intravenously (IV) according to pain score. Methadone was chosen in this case as opioids are optimum analgesia according to evidence-based acute pain management literature, and has excellent analgesic effects while causing minimal side effects (Walsh, 2019). If the pain score was more than 2/20 overall, then methadone was administered. 0.1 mg/kg top-ups were required to keep the patient comfortable twice during the initial recovery period. This was as a result of a consecutive pain score over 5/20, despite a 0.2 mg/kg IV dose of methadone 2 hours previously. In this case it was also desirable as methadone (Synthadon, Animalcare) has a wide dose range, meaning additional ‘top-ups’ could be given in order to keep the patient comfortable, without reaching a ceiling effect, which was necessary in this case (Walsh, 2019). This was used in conjunction with meloxicam (Metacam, Boehringer Ingleheim) per os (PO) once daily when the patient was eating reliably, and paracetamol 10 mg/kg PO every 8 hours to create a multi-modal approach to analgesia, which allowed the patient to remain comfortable throughout hospitalisation. Meloxicam, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), works peripherally to reduce inflammation, provide analgesia and also works as an anti-pyretic (Walsh, 2020). The mode of action of paracetamol is unknown, but it is thought to work similarly to conventional NSAIDs by acting at the level of the spinal cord to provide analgesia, and also acts as an anti-pyretic (Walsh, 2020).

Urinary catheter management was of particular importance in this case, as careful handling was required to prevent the catheter from losing patency and causing a uroabdomen through the surgical defect or causing sepsis. Additionally, the act of placing an indwelling urinary catheter can lower the natural defences within the body that work to prevent infection, and so proper maintenance was important (Ackerman, 2016). In order to reduce the risk of infection as much as possible, a strict aseptic technique should be adhered to at all times. Handwashing should be performed before and after handling the catheter, and sterile gloves should be worn (Ackerman, 2016). The urinary catheter should have a collection bag attached in order to accurately record the urine output and appearance of the urine. Interference should be prevented with a buster collar (Figure 2).


Figure 2. The patient lying comfortably in his kennel. A buster collar was fitted to prevent interference and the urinary catheter line was bandaged gently to the hind limb to prevent pulling or dislodging of the urinary catheter. The urinary collection bag is contained within a clean, lined litter tray to help prevent the patient from treading on the bag.

On day 4, extremely dark brown urine was noticed by the RVN, and urine output was noted to be poor with a reduction to just 0.37 ml/kg/hour (normal urine output for a well-hydrated patient that is not receiving intravenous fluid therapy is 1–2 ml/kg/hour). A bladder ultrasound scan was performed. This showed that the balloon of the urinary catheter was sitting in the proximal urethra, so this was repositioned using ultrasound guidance into the neck of the bladder. Urine output resolved quickly after this. This highlights the importance of regular recording the volume, colour and turbidity of urine in patients with indwelling urinary catheters, as this can help to identify problems such as misplacement or blockage of the urinary catheter (Bloor, 2018).

Wound management and management of faecal scalding was another large part of the nursing care involved with this case. The patient had extensive faecal scalding, which occurred almost immediately after surgery as a result of faecal incontinence, which is an often-unavoidable complication of this type of extensive surgery (Figure 3). Management and prevention of further problems was key. Silver sulfadiazine cream (Flamazine, Smith & Nephew) was applied liberally to the affected areas after washing gently with warm water. This was chosen for its topical antimicrobial effects and skin-repair properties, and to reduce the risk of wound breakdown; it prevents and treats skin infections and burns associated with urine and faecal scalding. There was still some wound breakdown on the caudal aspect of the wound on days 8–10, but during the first retrograde study the wound was debrided and re-sutured to combat this. A buster collar was used throughout hospitalisation to prevent patient interference, which can cause catastrophic complications, such as wound breakdown and infection, tissue necrosis or sepsis.


Figure 3. The patient developed intensive faecal scalding in the postoperative period. Because of the nature of the surgery, the perineal area was frequently soiled with faeces, so gentle cleansing of the skin multiple times per day was necessary with cool water, and barrier cream was applied frequently.

It is important to ensure that the patient's nutritional needs are met during hospitalisation, and it is a key factor in contributing to patient recovery (Corbee et al, 2014). This should be addressed early on during the hospitalisation period, as it has been proven in studies that early onset of optimum nutrition can reduce hospitalisation times in both animals and humans (Corbee et al, 2014). The resting energy requirements (RER) were calculated (30 times bodyweight in kilograms plus 70 equals RER in kilocalories per 24 hours) when the patient was admitted to hospital. In order to meet these requirements, the patient was tempted to eat with a variety of foods to encourage adequate intake. Warming of the food and hand feeding were also used to encourage the patient to eat. Water was also offered regularly to encourage hydration, as the patient had a buster collar at all times to prevent wound interference, which may have deterred drinking.

Retrograde studies

The patient underwent a urinary retrograde study under general anaesthesia on day 10 post-surgery to assess the patency of the urethra prior to removal of the urinary catheter. This involved instilling contrast medium into the urethra and then taking radiographs to assess for evidence of a leak of radiopaque dye from the urethral deficit. Unfortunately, there was evidence of minor leakage of contrast from the urethral tear, so the patient remained catheterised in hospital for a further 6 days. Repeat retrograde study at day 16 post-surgery showed a completely healed urethra, and the urinary catheter was removed. The patient passed urine 50 minutes after removal of the indwelling catheter and was discharged home the following day.

Outcome

The patient was discharged home with oral cephalexin (Rilexine, Virbac) for a remaining 5 days and continued to make a good recovery. At the 3-month postoperative check it was reported that the patient was well in himself and not faecally incontinent. A rectal examination showed slight thickening to the tissue of the right side of the anus, thought to be scar tissue. There were no urinary concerns since the surgery. The patient will represent 6 months after surgery for abdominal ultrasound and rectal examination to check for reoccurrence of the tumour or metastases.

Further considerations

On reflection, this patient may have benefited from the use of constant rate infusions of methadone or another analgesic such as ketamine to allow improved titration of analgesia and to prevent peaks and troughs in pain management. Similarly, although faecal scalding did not become prevalent until after the surgery, it may have been beneficial to instigate the use of topical barrier creams such as Cavilon (3M) immediately after surgery in order to protect the skin from damage and hopefully reduce the likelihood of severe faecal scalding.

Conclusions

This was a highly intensive case but with a brilliant outcome. Nursing care was a huge part of the recovery of this patient, and despite the challenging nature of the case, reuniting the patient with his owners was extremely rewarding.

KEY POINTS

  • Anal sac apocrine gland carcinomas are often discovered incidentally during routine patient examination.
  • Early diagnosis and staging are vital to get the best outcome for these patients.
  • Paraneoplastic hypercalcaemia can be seen in around 25–53% of cases.
  • Postoperative nursing care can be intensive but rewarding, and includes nutrition, wound management, analgesia and urinary catheter management.
  • Complications can include wound breakdown, urethral involvement and subsequent damage, faecal incontinence, faecal scalding and surgical site infection.
Download Now

Keep up to date with The Veterinary Nurse!

Sign up to The Veterinary Nurse's regular newsletters and keep up-to-date with the very latest clinical research and CPD we publish each month.