References

Barker CS, Soro V, Dymock D Time-dependent recontamination rates of sterilised dental instruments. Br Dent J. 2011; 211:(8) https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.869

Bhumisirikul W, Bhumisirikul P, Srisiri S Shelf life of sterile small surgical instruments packaged in double linen versus plastic-paper wraps. The Thai Journal of Surgery. 2000; 21:(3)101-4

Bhumisirikul W, Bhumisirikul P, Pongchairerks P Long-term storage of small surgical instruments in autoclaved packages. Asian J Surg. 2003; 26:(4)202-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60303-1

Brusca MI, Nastri N, Mosca CO Long-term sterility of orthodonticsurgical appliances. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2004; 17:(1–2)23-7

Butt WE, Bradley DV, Mayhew RB, Schwartz RS Evaluation of the shelf life of sterile instrument packs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991; 72:(6)650-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(91)90004-v

Kerrigan L Factors associated with steam sterilisation failure. The Veterinary Nurse. 2013; 4:138-44 https://doi.org/10.12968/vetn.2013.4.3.138

Klumdeth J, Jantaratnotai N, Thaweboon S, Pachimsawat P Sterility maintenance of reused disposable paper/plastic sterilization pouches in actual clinical practice. Heliyon. 2020; 6:(3) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03672

McBirney SE, Trinh K, Wong-Beringer A, Armani AM Wavelengthnormalized spectroscopic analysis of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth rates. Biomed Opt Express. 2016; 7:(10)4034-42 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.004034

Millpledge. MillpackTM The ultimate all-in-one sterilisation pouch. 2023. https://millpledge.com/product-knowledge/millpack-the-ultimate-all-in-one-sterilisation-pouch

Morton PJ, Conner R Implementing AORN recommended practices for selection and use of packaging systems for sterilization. AORN J. 2014; 99:(4)495-502 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2014.02.014

Packer M, Devaney J How to manage infection control in the operating theatre. The Veterinary Nurse. 2010; 1:(2)115-8 https://doi.org/10.12968/vetn.2010.1.2.115

Palananthana M, Pachimsawat P, Thaweboon S Microbial finding of reused laminated film pouches stored in closed cabinet for 4 months. Mahidol Dental Journal. 2006; 36:(3)179-86

Puangsa-Ard Y, Thaweboon S, Jantaratnotai N, Pachimsawat P Effects of resterilization and storage time on sterility of paper/plastic pouches. Eur J Dent. 2018; 12:(3)417-21 https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_351_17

Rosa AC, Brusca MI, Manto MC Effects of handling and storage on sterile dental instruments. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2001; 14:(1–2)35-9

Sattayasanskul W, Saetoh S, Thiengmontree A, Veerakeiatsoonthorn S [Effect of storage time on sterility of instrument in oral surgical packs]. J Dent Assoc Thai. 1990; 40:(2)54-8

Schwartz R, Davis R Safe storage times for sterile dental packs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990; 70:(3)297-300 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(90)90144-h

ThermoFisher Sceientfic. Nutrient Broth No. 2 (Dehydrated). 2023. https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/CM0067B

Vet Sustain. Greener veterinary practice checklist. 2021. https://vetsustain.org/resources/vet-practice-checklist

Webster J, Lloyd W, Ho P Rethinking sterilization practices: evidence for event-related outdating. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003; 24:(8)622-4 https://doi.org/10.1086/502264

Widmer AF, Houston A, Bollinger E, Wenzel RP A new standard for sterility testing for autoclaved surgical trays. J Hosp Infect. 1992; 21:(4)253-60 https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6701(92)90136-a

Impact of storage on sterility of surgical instruments in autoclave bags

02 October 2024
14 mins read
Volume 15 · Issue 8

Abstract

Background:

There is no published veterinary research to support an optimal storage duration and method of sterile surgical instrumentation (SI) when using self-seal autoclave bags (SSABs), although aspects of research from human healthcare are transferable. Multiple pieces of research in human healthcare have demonstrated the ability of sterilisation packaging materials to maintain barrier integrity and sterility for several months poststerilisation. Research on an optimal storage method is inconclusive.

Aims:

To determine an ideal storage duration and method of single SI, packaged in SSABs and sterilised via an autoclave. To determine the current practice of sterilisation, storage methods and durations using SSABs in small animal practice.

Methods:

This mixed methods study consisted of an online questionnaire to investigate the current procedures for autoclave sterilisation in veterinary practice. Alongside this, a non-randomised control study was conducted to assess the sterility of single SI, packaged in SSABs and sterilised via autoclave, to determine an ideal storage duration and method. SI was sterilised and stored for one, three and six months, in open (on a shelf) and closed (in a box) environments.

Results:

The questionnaire indicated veterinary professionals are adopting a cautious approach to storage durations with 75.5% (n=40) storing sterile single SI for between one and three months, prior to reprocessing. The experimental study did not identify an optimal storage method and either open or closed could be used for effective storage in undisturbed conditions. It is highly probable that most SI were sterile at the end of the storage durations and for up to 6 months.

Conclusions:

Laboratory findings are mostly consistent with those in existing literature. Results suggest the storage of sterile SI, in either open or closed environments for up to 6 months was not detrimental to the sterility of the instruments. To encourage good sustainability performance, practices could extend the storage times of sterilised SI prior to reprocessing.

In veterinary practice, surgical instruments and kits are routinely prepacked and sterilised ready for use, but then may remain in storage for a period prior to being used. There is currently no published veterinary research to support an optimal storage method and duration of storage to maintain sterility of surgical instrumentation (SI) when using self-seal autoclave bags (SSABs). However, there is a small body of research in human healthcare (Sattayasanskul et al, 1990; Schwartz and Davis, 1990; Butt et al, 1991; Bhumisirikul et al, 2000; Rosa et al, 2001; Bhumisirikul et al, 2003; Brusca et al, 2004; Barker et al, 2011), which could be used as a guide in clinical practice. Some research recommended storage duration, whereas others expressed inconclusive evidence. There are several recommendations from manufacturers of veterinary SSABs and in existing veterinary literature. For example, Millpledge (2023) suggested a 3–6 month shelf life of their SSABs, post sterilisation, depending on the handling and storage conditions In addition, KRUUSE stated that SI will remain sterile for up to 6 months post sterilisation when using their SSABs (https://tinyurl.com/2y2mb3mf).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting The Veterinary Nurse and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.